Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.330 · C. PETITION, ARRAIGNMENT, ADJUDICATION, AND DISPOSITION
ADJUDICATORY HEARINGS
Text — October 1, 2026 edition
(a) Hearing by Judge. The adjudicatory hearing must be conducted by the judge, without a jury, utilizing the rules of evidence in use in civil cases. At this hearing the court must determine whether the allegations of the dependency petition have been sustained by a preponderance of the evidence. If the court is of the opinion that the allegations are sustained by clear and convincing evidence, it may enter an order so stating.
(b) Examination of Witnesses. A party may call any person as a witness. A party has the right to examine or cross-examine all witnesses. However, the child and the parents, caregivers, or legal custodians of the child may be examined separately and apart from each other.
(c) Presence of Parties. All parties have the right to be present at all hearings. A party may appear in person or, at the discretion of the court for good cause shown, by communication technology. No party may be excluded from any hearing unless so ordered by the court for disruptive behavior or as provided by law. If a person appears for the arraignment hearing and the court orders that person to appear at the adjudicatory hearing for dependency, stating the date, time, and place of the adjudicatory hearing and, if the hearing will be held through communication technology, instructions for appearing at the hearing through communication technology, then that person’s failure to appear for the scheduled adjudicatory hearing constitutes consent to a dependency adjudication.
(d) Joint and Separate Hearings. When 2 or more children are alleged to be dependent children, the hearing may be held simultaneously when the several children involved are related to each other or involved in the same case, unless the court orders separate hearings.
(e) Motion for Judgment of Dismissal. In all dependency adjudicatory proceedings, if at the close of the evidence for the petitioner a party moves for a judgment of dismissal and the court finds that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the grounds alleged in the dependency petition, it must enter an order dismissing the petition or find that allegations in the petition have not been sustained as to a particular parent or legal custodian. If the court does not dismiss the petition, the parties, including all parents, must continue to receive pleadings, notices, and documents and to have the right to be heard.
(f) Dismissal. If the court finds after all the evidence has been presented that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the grounds alleged in the dependency petition, it must enter an order dismissing the case for insufficiency of the evidence or find that allegations in the petition have not been sustained as to a particular parent or legal custodian and proceed with the dispositional alternatives available at law. If the court does not dismiss the petition, the parties, including all parents, must continue to receive pleadings, notices, and documents and to have the right to be heard.
Notes and commentary — not rule text
Committee Notes
1991 Amendment. (a) This change gives the court the option of making a finding based on a higher burden of proof to eliminate the need for a repetitive hearing on the same evidence if a termination of parental rights petition is filed.
Source of truth
- Edition
- October 1, 2026 edition
- Official file
- https://www-media.floridabar.org/uploads/2026/09/2027_04-OCT-Florida-Rules-of-Juvenile-Procedure-10-1-2026.pdf (PDF pages 183–185)
- Text hash
- sha256 b8cc6ec1e620101cb33f71992fb5cf0a8cd9cf37b1be79dcb2ba1afe5b2dfcc2
- Composed by
- compose_book.py 2026-10-03: pypdfium2 primary, PyMuPDF check, PDF bookmarks as the inventory
Procedural information only. Not legal advice and not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Confirm the current text with the official publisher before relying on it.