Loading…
Premium Judge Intelligence Report
Members-only reportSign in to open the full report.
Create a free account to keep this dossier and its scan results, then open the full report as a $29 Single Report or with Professional (25 reports / month). Unlocked reports stay open on your account permanently.
Create your free account →
Marianne C. Gilbert
Superior Court Judge · Superior Court of California, County of Kings · Kings County, California
High confidence· verified October 20, 2026
- verified requirements
- 53
- verified requirements
- rule deadlines
- 29
- rule deadlines
- sources cited
- 4
- sources cited
- reviewed insights
- 0
- reviewed insights
- verified rulings
- 0
- verified rulings
Verification profile
- High · 53
- Medium · 0
- Low · 0
- Unverified · 0
Report generated October 24, 2026 · benchpath.ai/reports/judge/ca-marianne-c-gilbert
01 Division & assignment
Department 6 (6)
Official divisional instructions →Assignment as stated in the order
Judge — Department 6, Superior Court of California, County of Kings
02 Live Case-Type Intelligence Scan
Live case-type intelligence scan
● LiveAnswer three quick questions. The platform pulls Marianne C. Gilbert's full public case-law record from the source, newest first — your matter never narrows the pull; it directs the relevance ranking and the dual-AI analysis. Every hit comes back Bluebook-cited with the opinion's own words quoted verbatim. The scan takes the time precision takes.
- 1. Case area & type
- 2. Refine
- 3. Review & scan
Case-law search
CourtListener · free connector · liveCoverage note: CourtListener is strongest for federal and state appellate courts; California superior-court opinions are sparsely represented.
Research connectors
CourtListener
● liveFree Law Project
Free. Opinions, dockets, RECAP, judge metadata. Powering the case-law search on this page.
Westlaw
○ bring your licenseThomson Reuters
Bring your firm's license — enterprise connector queries your judge and related cases inside Westlaw. Phase 2.
LexisNexis
○ bring your licenseRELX
Bring your firm's license — enterprise connector for Lexis+ research tied to your matter. Phase 2.
BenchPath never scrapes licensed databases. Westlaw and LexisNexis connect only through your firm's own credentials and entitlements when the enterprise connectors ship.
03 Division intelligence
Division peer delta
● LiveNo other published judge currently sits in this judge's divisions, so there is no peer set to diff — the divisional requirements below ARE the division's practice.
Local-rule conflict sentinel
● LiveNo judge-level deadline on record runs shorter than a statewide deadline with the same trigger. The sentinel compares quoted timing across every published rule scoped to this judge on each visit — a clean result today is re-earned tomorrow.
04 Appellate record (1)
05 Procedural requirements (53)
06 Deadline table
07 Ruling intelligence
No verified ruling summary yet — summaries publish only after human review of a real opinion/docket corpus. The live scan at the top of this report covers what public sources hold today.
08 Source appendix (4)
- Superior Court of California, County of Kings — court websiteHealthychecked October 24, 2026
- Superior Court of California, County of Kings — local rules (Judicial Council index listing)Healthychecked October 24, 2026
- California Codes — Legislative Counsel (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)Healthychecked September 28, 2026
- California Rules of Court — Judicial Council of CaliforniaHealthychecked October 23, 2026
10 Contribute ground truth
Intelligence skills executed on this report
Procedural FingerprintConferral Stack AnalyzerDeadline Matrix BuilderAI-Filing Policy DetectorEx Parte & Motion-Calendar DecoderProposed-Order Protocol ExtractorRuling Corpus ScannerDivision Peer DeltaReassignment & Vacancy RadarSource Freshness AuditorChambers Access CardAppellate Exposure MapperAttorney Ground-Truth IntakeLocal-Rule Conflict Sentinel
This report compiles procedural information and public-record research from the official sources cited above, with per-item verification status. It is not legal advice, contains no outcome predictions, is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney, and creates no attorney–client relationship. Items below high confidence must be verified against the official source before relying on them. Print with your browser for a clean PDF.