Premium Judge Intelligence Report
Members-only reportSign in to open the full report.
Create a free account to keep this dossier and its scan results, then open the full report as a $29 Single Report or with Professional (25 reports / month). Unlocked reports stay open on your account permanently.
Create your free account →District Judge · 86th District Court · Kaufman County, Texas
Verification profile
Report generated October 14, 2026 · benchpath.ai/reports/judge/tx-casey-l-blair
District Judge — 86th District Court (Kaufman County)
Answer three quick questions. The platform pulls Casey L. Blair's full public case-law record from the source, newest first — your matter never narrows the pull; it directs the relevance ranking and the dual-AI analysis. Every hit comes back Bluebook-cited with the opinion's own words quoted verbatim. The scan takes the time precision takes.
Case-law search
CourtListener · free connector · liveCoverage note: CourtListener is strongest for federal and state appellate courts; Texas trial-court opinions are essentially absent from the source.
Research connectors
CourtListener
● liveFree Law Project
Free. Opinions, dockets, RECAP, judge metadata. Powering the case-law search on this page.
Westlaw
○ bring your licenseThomson Reuters
Bring your firm's license — enterprise connector queries your judge and related cases inside Westlaw. Phase 2.
LexisNexis
○ bring your licenseRELX
Bring your firm's license — enterprise connector for Lexis+ research tied to your matter. Phase 2.
BenchPath never scrapes licensed databases. Westlaw and LexisNexis connect only through your firm's own credentials and entitlements when the enterprise connectors ship.
Appeals from this courtroom go to the Fifth Court of Appeals.
● LiveThat court's published bench (13): Bonnie Lee Goldstein, Craig Smith, Cynthia M. Barbare, Dennise Garcia, Earl Jackson, Emily Miskel, Gino J. Rossini, J.J. Koch, Jessica Lewis, Maricela Moore Breedlove, Mike Lee, Nancy Kennedy, Tina Clinton
No verified ruling summary yet — summaries publish only after human review of a real opinion/docket corpus. The live scan at the top of this report covers what public sources hold today.
Intelligence skills executed on this report
This report compiles procedural information and public-record research from the official sources cited above, with per-item verification status. It is not legal advice, contains no outcome predictions, is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney, and creates no attorney–client relationship. Items below high confidence must be verified against the official source before relying on them. Print with your browser for a clean PDF.
County-to-district assignment per Tex. Gov't Code sec. 22.201(f), live-fetched registry.
No judge-level deadline on record runs shorter than a statewide deadline with the same trigger. The sentinel compares quoted timing across every published rule scoped to this judge on each visit — a clean result today is re-earned tomorrow.
Verified the complete requirement set for Judge Casey L. Blair unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →Verified the deadline matrix unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →Discovery Control Plan and Scheduling Order (422nd Dist. Ct., Kaufman Cty.)
The 422nd's standard Discovery Control Plan and Scheduling Order (Judge Gibbs; entered per case with dates): Daubert/Dupont challenges on file at least 10 days before hearing; dispositive motions filed and heard by the set date; MEDIATION REQUIRED IN ALL CASES, completed 5 weeks before trial — not an automatic continuance ground, with non-mediating parties limited to 30 minutes per side at trial; jury-trial pretrial production two weeks out (one-page trial summary, proposed charges, exhibits for stipulation, Rule 166a matters; pretrial motions filed 10 days before the formal conference); jury trial, jury announcement, and pretrial slots set per case, bench trials with a default-judgment warning; continuances filed and ruled on before trial absent extenuating circumstances.
422nd District Court Time Standards (posted on the court's official page)
The 422nd's posted disposition time standards, parallel to the 86th's: criminal — revocations 6 months, state-jail felonies 90 days, third-degree 180 days, second-degree 9 months, first-degree 1 year; family — uncontested 3 months, contested 6–9 months, with modification and enforcement expectations in the same table.
County Court at Law No. 2 Court Rules and Procedures (Kaufman Cty., posted on the court's official page)
Judge Bobby L. Rich, Jr.'s court rules for CCL No. 2 (the court holding misdemeanors and DWI felonies L–Z, contested probate, mental health, property tax, and half the county civil docket under the county assignment rules): the certificate-of-conference gate and two-alternative certificate; the judge-approval list for show-cause, habeas, attachment, garnishment, injunctive, protective, and TRO-extension orders; the court's Notice of Hearing (County Court at Law #2, 2nd Floor) with the certificate required on all notices and administrator-set hearings; TRCP 21 removal/reset with cost exposure; agreed final settings by scheduling order that must include mediation completed at least 5 weeks before trial; dilatory pleas heard ≥10 days pre-trial; mandatory scheduling conferences with the contents list and the trial-date-at-temporary-orders rule; optional pretrial conferences with attendance/authority rules and no-show consequences; conflicting-engagement and mediation-precedence rules; and the DWOP regime — the court's civil-practice framework in the 86th/422nd family, adapted to the county court at law.
Administrative Order Establishing Procedure for Bail Review under Article 17.029, Code of Criminal Procedure (Kaufman Cty. dist. cts., signed Dec. 17, 2025) (Index-25-485)
The district courts' SB 9 (Art. 17.029 CCP) bail-review procedure, signed Dec. 17, 2025 by Judge Casey Blair as Local Administrative District Judge: in every felony case where the initial bail was set by a magistrate who is not a district judge, a written request (a "Motion for Review of Bail" preferred, no form required) filed with the District Clerk triggers immediate time-stamping, assignment to the district judge who would receive the indicted case (any available district judge if unavailable), and immediate email-and-telephone notice to the reviewing judge with the defendant's name, filing time, the motion, current bail and conditions, and custody status; the clerk logs every request. The reviewing judge must rule "as soon as practicable, but no later than the close of business on the next business day" after the clerk received the request, complying with Art. 17.09 and all bail rules, considering the offense reports, affidavits, criminal history, and any evidence, with a discretionary hearing (video or in person for in-custody defendants). To increase bail or add conditions for an out-of-custody defendant, the judge must first issue a summons to a bail hearing and may issue an arrest warrant only if the defendant fails to appear.
Rules for Assignment of Cases for District and County Clerk (Kaufman Cty., eff. Apr. 5, 2024) (Index-24-458)
The county's case-assignment map, signed by Judge Casey Blair as Administrative District Judge (effective 04/05/2024) and directed to the District and County Clerks: CCL No. 2 (Judge Rich) takes all misdemeanors and DWI felonies for last names L–Z, all contested probate, all mental-health hearings, all property-tax cases, and half the county civil docket; the CCL (Judge Russell) takes misdemeanors and DWI felonies A–K, juvenile, CPS, condemnation, and the other half of county civil; each district court (86th Blair, 422nd Gibbs, 489th Gray) takes one-third of district civil, one-third of family, and one-third of non-DWI felonies split by defendant last name (A–F Blair, G–M Gibbs, N–Z Gray).
Kaufman County Standing Order for Family Law Cases (eff. filings on/after July 18, 2024) (TOPICs reg. doc 2111)
The county-wide family standing order of the Kaufman County District and County Courts at Law (signed July 15, 2024 by all five judges; effective for every divorce and SAPCR filed on or after July 18, 2024; adopted under Family Code §§ 6.501–6.503, 105.001, 105.009): contempt-enforceable (up to $500 and six months' county jail per violation plus fee judgments), it operates as a 14-day TRO after filing and continues as a temporary injunction unless contested; the petitioner must attach it to the Original Petition. It orders the familiar protections: TRO/ex-parte applications require 2-hour advance notice to the other side (with irreparable-harm certificate exceptions); children may not be hidden, moved from Texas, or withdrawn from school absent written agreement or court order; no derogatory comments, litigation talk in a child's hearing, alcohol within 12 hours of possession, illegal drugs, or overnight dating partners during possession (divorces); conduct rules against harassment, mail diversion, account access, and pet interference; property/records/insurance preservation in divorces (including a metadata/native-format preservation clause and a no-social-media-deletion clause); mediation REQUIRED in all contested family cases (≥45 days before trial, rotating-list assignment if not agreed, sanctions up to dismissal or default for non-participation, and no continuance for failure to mediate); bond waived.
Standing Order Regarding Audio/Visual Evidence (Kaufman Cty. dist. and county courts, signed July 1, 2024) (TOPICs reg. doc 2112)
The county-wide media-exhibit order signed by all five Kaufman County district and county-court-at-law judges: audio/video exhibits must be in a format the court of appeals can upload and accept — audio files capped at 100 MB, video at 2 GB, valid extensions MP3, MP4, and WAV (the sponsoring party converts anything else); ONLY the offered segments may be on the tendered media (a 50-call jail DVD must be cut down to the offered calls); and if the 5th Court of Appeals cannot open an exhibit on appeal, the sponsoring party must re-supply it in the acceptable format.