Loading…
A general order of the court over the signature of the Honorable David M Sanders, Presiding Judge, filed August 10, 2026: indigent litigants (defined as those with a current fee waiver) upon request in all cases (including family law, probate, and unlimited civil matters) will be provided with meaningful access to an official verbatim record of proceedings, including by means of electronic recording, if an official reporter or official reporter pro tempore is unavailable; adopted pursuant to the California Supreme Court decision in Family Violence Appellate Project v Superior Court of Contra Costa County (8/10/26) S288176.
California > Third Appellate District > Calaveras County > Superior Court of California, County of Calaveras
GENERAL ORDER NO. 26-03 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CALAVERAS ORDER OF MEANINGFUL ACCESS TO OFFICIAL VERBATIM RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Indigent litigants (defined as those with a current fee waiver) upon request in all cases (including family law, probate, and unlimited civil matters) will be provided with meaningful access to an official verbatim record of proceedings, including by means of electronic recording, if an official reporter or official reporter pro tempore is unavailable. This General Order is adopted pursuant to the California Supreme Court decision in Family Violence Appellate Project v Superior Court of Contra Costa County (8/10/26) S288176.) IT IS SO ORDERED Date: Honorable David M Sanders Presiding Judge
GENERAL ORDER NO. 26-03 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CALAVERAS ORDER OF MEANINGFUL ACCESS TO OFFICIAL VERBATIM RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Indigent litigants (defined as those with a current fee waiver) upon request in all cases (including family law, probate, and unlimited civil matters) will be provided with meaningful access to an official verbatim record of proc
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Calaveras build 2026-10-12) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-calaveras/docs/local-rules/26-03-2026-order-meaningful-access-official-verbatim-record-proceedings.pdf (54749 bytes, sha256 10c0f7f8a9a6ca9df325f40fbe0506b5d6e2bcb899e08e53b18c3e02b81621c0; 1 page; page images, no text layer): read on the page image rendered at 200 dpi (the order's paragraph read again at 300 dpi, its date line at 300 and 600 dpi and the clerk's filing stamp at 400 dpi; the file has no text layer); checked against RapidOCR on the page, never published: every 6-word window of the transcription looked up, and the 2 spans the reading does not hold each split into pieces it holds - the order's number before the court's name, and “IT IS SO ORDERED Date:” before the signature block, with the filing stamp and the handwritten date set between them by the reading (vision/check-log.txt). The Presiding Judge's handwritten signature and the clerk's filing stamp are not part of the text; the pleading line numbers and the page number are not carried; the title's two printed lines are set as one heading; the citation's closing parenthesis, which has no opening one, is carried as printed; the date written by hand on the date line, which reads 8/10/26 or 8/16/26, is left out of the text (the card carries the filing stamp's date, AUG 10 2026 - a review task); the transcription's closing note, which describes the page, is not published. Review note: The order's handwritten date reads 8/10/26 or 8/16/26 - its middle digit, a small loop under a hooked stroke, can be read either way (vision/check-log.txt) - while the clerk's filing stamp prints AUG 10 2026; the card carries the filing date (a review task).
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.