Loading…
The stipulation and standing order dated 11-5-96 between the district attorney and the public defender for all accused persons represented by the Office of the Public Defender: an informal request for pretrial discovery deemed made; discovery to the Public Defender under Penal Code sections 1054 and 1054.1 - the names, addresses and statements of the prosecution's witnesses, their pending charges, convictions and probations, promises or inducements, the defendant's criminal record, experts' notes and reports, photographs on request, inspection of physical evidence, all police reports, statements of all defendants, additional exculpatory evidence and examination results; discovery to the District Attorney under Penal Code sections 1054 and 1054.3 - the defense witnesses' names, addresses and statements, experts' statements, examination and test results and inspection of evidence; and the orders in effect until either office files a written notice of withdrawal of approval with proof of service.
California > Fifth Appellate District > Kern County > Superior Court of California, County of Kern
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, vs. ALL ACCUSED PERSONS REPRESENTED BY THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, Defendant. No. SC0***** 5.5-3242 STIPULATION; STANDING ORDER FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY TO: MR. EDWARD R. JAGELS, District Attorney of Kern County; MR. MARK A. ARNOLD, Public Defender of Kern County; the BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT; the KERN COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; and to such other police agency as may have been involved in the case investigation. The undersigned stipulate and agree that an informal request for pretrial discovery is deemed to have been made herein. The undersigned further stipulate to the following orders for discovery: I. Pre-trial discovery shall be provided to the Office of the Kern County Public Defender pursuant to Penal Code sections 1054 and 1054.1 of the items set forth therein, including, but not limited to, the following: A. The names, addresses and statements of the persons the prosecution intends to call as witnesses during trial, including, but not limited to, written, recorded, or oral statements which are exculpatory, or which are inconsistent with statements previously made; A.1 Charges pending against said witnesses, felony convictions, misdemeanor and/or felony probations, any records of all acts or misdemeanor convictions of said witnesses involving moral turpitude; A.2 Any and all promises and/or inducements of any kind made to any witness to induce or encourage him/her to assist the prosecution in the investigation of the case, or to testify for the prosecution; B. A copy of defendant’s criminal record or "rap" sheet; C. Copies of expert notes, diagrams, graphs, reports, and any and all other analysis made or to be made of items of physical evidence in the case, including, but not limited to, results of any scientific tests, experiments, or comparisons of any type, written or oral, which the prosecution intends to offer in evidence at trial; D. Upon request of counsel with the agency in possession thereof, copies of any and all photographs taken in connection with the investigation of the case; E. Inspection by the Office of the Public Defender and/or by the expert retained therefore, of the items of physical evidence seized and retained in the case. Release of said items for independent examination or testing shall be upon stipulation of counsel or further order of court; F. Copies of all police reports; G. Statements of all defendants; H. Any and all additional exculpatory evidence not otherwise specified herein; I. Results of any physical or mental examinations, of the defendant or of any other person, which the prosecution intends to offer in evidence at trial. II. Pre-trial discovery shall be provided to the Office of the Kern County District Attorney pursuant to Penal Code sections 1054 and 1054.3 of the items set forth therein, including, but not limited to, the following: A. The names and addresses of any and all persons, excepting the defendant, who the defense intends to call as witnesses at trial; B. Any relevant written statements, reports of statements, or tape recordings of statements of such witnesses; C. Any relevant written or recorded statements made by any expert who the defense intends to call as a witness at trial; D. Any relevant results, written or oral, of any physical or mental examinations which the defense intends to offer in evidence at trial; E. Any relevant results, written or oral, of any scientific tests, experiments, or comparisons of any type which the defense intends to offer in evidence at trial; F. Reasonable right of inspection and/or copying of any real or tangible items of evidence which the defense intends to offer in evidence at trial. The orders provided for herein shall remain in effect until either the Kern County District Attorney or the Kern County Public Defender files with this court a written notice of withdrawal of approval and proof of service upon the opposing party. Dated: 10/31/96. DISTRICT ATTORNEY Dated: 10-31-96. PUBLIC DEFENDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11-5-96 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, vs. ALL ACCUSED PERSONS REPRESENTED BY THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, Defendant. No. SC0***** 5.5-3242 STIPULATION; STANDING ORDER FOR PRETRIAL DISCOVERY TO: MR. EDWARD R. JAGELS, District Attorney of Kern County; MR. MARK A. ARNOLD, Public Defender of Kern County; the B
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-14 (California T4 Kern build 2026-10-14) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-kern/docs/stip_standing_order_discovery.pdf (135338 bytes, sha256 1b2c9ba2bae5c6c0fee6397ba3ae2c3d3c9e581fcb3137ce951fd397cda13c25; 4 pages, each covered by scanned images; no text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi (vision/img/pdd-p01.png to pdd-p04.png; four typewritten pages on pleading paper, endorsed filed NOV 5 1996; the file's pages are images with no text layer); checked against three RapidOCR readings of the images (at 200, 300 and 150 dpi), never published: of the transcription's 672 words, 48 6-word windows were not found in a reading, in 6 spans - 3 spans split into consecutive pieces each found (a page break, a caption box or a filing stamp the readings interleave, or the readings' line order) and 3 spans read again on the page images and found as transcribed (vision/check-log.txt; evidence/vision-check-2026-10-14-run2.log). The caption's number prints asterisks for its digits, as transcribed. The three dates are handwritten. Not part of the text: the pleading paper's line numbers 1 to 26, the clerk's endorsed-filed stamp, the caption's closing parentheses and rule, the page numbers "2" to "3", and the signatures over the District Attorney's, the Public Defender's and the judge's lines. The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published. Review note: The Standing Orders page lists it under Criminal as “SO - Stipulation; Standing Order for Pretrial Discovery” and describes “a longstanding operative order from 1996”.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.