Loading…
The court's policy, effective March 27, 2023, to discontinue the imposition of civil assessments under Penal Code section 1214.1 in each eligible case in which a defendant has failed to appear or failed to pay, the court retaining discretion to impose civil assessments.
California > Fifth Appellate District > Kern County > Superior Court of California, County of Kern
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN IN RE: DISCONTINUING THE IMPOSITION OF CIVIL ASSESSMENTS UPON FAILURE TO APPEAR OR FAILURE TO PAY MISCELLANEOUS NO.: STO-23-0005 THE COURT HEREBY FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Effective March 27, 2023, it is the policy of the Superior Court of California, County of Kern, to discontinue the imposition of civil assessments under Penal Code section 1214.1 in each eligible case in which a defendant has failed to appear or failed to pay. In accordance with Penal Code section 1214.1 and other applicable law, the court retains discretion to impose civil assessments. Dated: March 21, 2023. J. Eric Bradshaw, Presiding Judge Kern County Superior Court
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN IN RE: DISCONTINUING THE IMPOSITION OF CIVIL ASSESSMENTS UPON FAILURE TO APPEAR OR FAILURE TO PAY MISCELLANEOUS NO.: STO-23-0005 THE COURT HEREBY FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Effective March 27, 2023, it is the policy of the Superior Court of California, County of Kern, to discontinue the imposition of civil assessments under
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-14 (California T4 Kern build 2026-10-14) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-kern/docs/general/so-civil-assessments-eff-32723.pdf (145486 bytes, sha256 84601369d3e50e5e60b3dcc383e3d5bb40a81069f75ca53658f5c6898d264988; 1 page, covered by scanned images; a machine reading laid with the images on it (drawn and invisible on 1 page) - not the card's source): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi (vision/img/dca-p01.png; one page on pleading paper, filed 03/21/2023; the file's page is an image under a machine reading); checked against a RapidOCR reading of the images (at 200 dpi) and the file's own machine reading laid with the images, never published: of the transcription's 118 words, 24 6-word windows were not found in a reading, in 4 spans, each split into consecutive pieces found in a reading (a page break, a caption box or a filing stamp the readings interleave, or the readings' line order) (vision/check-log.txt; evidence/vision-check-2026-10-14-run2.log). The day of the date, "21", is handwritten. Not part of the text: the pleading paper's line numbers 1 to 25, the clerk's filing stamp, the caption's box, the signature, and the footer "STANDING ORDER– DISCONTINUING THE ROUTINE IMPOSITION OF CIVIL ASSESSMENTS FTA FTP". The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.