Loading…
The court's standing order of December 5, 2024 under Government Code section 68645.3(e) and California Rules of Court, rule 4.335: a new ability-to-pay determination for the same fines or penalties requested only if there has been a change in the circumstances of the petitioner/defendant after a previous determination, a clerk conducting the determination on the rule's criteria; review by a judicial officer on a written petition; and Local Rule 4.4 to be amended in the next local rules cycle.
California > Fifth Appellate District > Kern County > Superior Court of California, County of Kern
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN IN RE: REQUESTS TO REDUCE OR VACATE FINES AND FEES FOR INFRACTION OFFENSES MISCELLANEOUS NO.: STO-24-0011 THE COURT HEREBY FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Under Government Code section 68645.3(e) and California Rules of Court, rule 4.335, a new ability-to-pay determination for the same fines or penalties can only be requested if there has been a change in the circumstances of the petitioner/defendant, following a previous determination. If such a request is made, a clerk may conduct the determination based on the criteria outlined in California Rules of Court, rule 4.335, as permitted by Government Code section 68645.3(e). Should the petitioner/defendant seek review by a judicial officer, a written petition must be submitted. Local Rule 4.4 will be amended to reflect this change in the next local rules cycle. THIS ORDER IS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY. Dated: December 5, 2024. J. Eric Bradshaw, Presiding Judge Kern County Superior Court
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KERN IN RE: REQUESTS TO REDUCE OR VACATE FINES AND FEES FOR INFRACTION OFFENSES MISCELLANEOUS NO.: STO-24-0011 THE COURT HEREBY FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Under Government Code section 68645.3(e) and California Rules of Court, rule 4.335, a new ability-to-pay determination for the same fines or penalties can only be requested if
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-14 (California T4 Kern build 2026-10-14) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-kern/docs/forms-and-filings/court-standing-order-sto-24-0011.pdf (176759 bytes, sha256 82fe37e04a451240a11c929a2da18da892c0c1c6076f68abff52aa4a9728a59c; 2 pages, each covered by scanned images; a machine reading laid with the images on 2 of them (drawn on 1 page, invisible on 1 page) - not the card's source): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi (vision/img/atp-p01.png and atp-p02.png; two pages on pleading paper, filed 12/5/2024; the file's pages are images under a machine reading); checked against a RapidOCR reading of the images (at 200 dpi) and the file's own machine reading laid with the images, never published: of the transcription's 160 words, 17 6-word windows were not found in a reading, in 3 spans, each split into consecutive pieces found in a reading (a page break, a caption box or a filing stamp the readings interleave, or the readings' line order) (vision/check-log.txt; evidence/vision-check-2026-10-14-run2.log). The day of the date, "5", is handwritten. Not part of the text: the pleading paper's line numbers 1 to 25, the clerk's filing stamp, the caption's box, the page-fill marks (two lines of four backslashes) at the foot of page 1, the signature, and the footer "STANDING ORDER– REQUESTS TO REDUCE OR VACATE CIVIL ASSESSMENTS FOR INFRACTION OFFENSES" with "Page 1" and "Page 2". The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.