Loading…
The standing order of February 2, 2007 of the Presiding Judge for the Family Law Department: any limitation that would disqualify a temporary judge from hearing a case if the temporary judge also has a case pending in another family law court on the same day is waived, the waiver predicated on the temporary judge receiving and accepting a waiver of the requirements from the litigants and/or their attorneys under California Rule of Court 2.818(c)(1).
California > Fifth Appellate District > Kern County > Superior Court of California, County of Kern
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, METROPOLITAN DIVISION IN RE: WAIVER OF CONFLICT/TEMPORARY JUDGES CASE NO.: S-1501-MF-60445 STANDING ORDER Based upon Judicial resources, allocated to Family Law Department, the Presiding Judge hereby waives any limitation that would disqualify a temporary judge from hearing a case if that temporary judge also has a case pending in another family law court on the same day. This waiver of the Presiding Judge is predicated on the temporary judge receiving and accepting a waiver of the requirements from the litigants and/or their attorneys pursuant to California Rule of Court 2.818(c)(1). Dated: February 2, 2007 Jerold L. Turner, Presiding Judge of the Superior Court
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, METROPOLITAN DIVISION IN RE: WAIVER OF CONFLICT/TEMPORARY JUDGES CASE NO.: S-1501-MF-60445 STANDING ORDER Based upon Judicial resources, allocated to Family Law Department, the Presiding Judge hereby waives any limitation that would disqualify a temporary judge from hearing a case if that temporary judge also has a case pending in another f
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-14 (California T4 Kern build 2026-10-14) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-kern/docs/general/waiverconflicttemporary_judges_2207.pdf (29638 bytes, sha256 4fbea396ba5137df22bb112f2bb1941c1f00d25ddd3c73d6b385b5086452e463; 1 page, covered by scanned images; no text layer): read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi (vision/img/tjw-p01.png; one page on pleading paper, endorsed filed FEB 02 2007; the file's page is an image with no text layer); checked against three RapidOCR readings of the images (at 200, 300 and 150 dpi), never published: of the transcription's 113 words, 46 6-word windows were not found in a reading, in 4 spans - 2 spans split into consecutive pieces each found (a page break, a caption box or a filing stamp the readings interleave, or the readings' line order) and 2 spans read again on the page images and found as transcribed (vision/check-log.txt; evidence/vision-check-2026-10-14-run2.log). The caption's number is the order's own file number. Not part of the text: the pleading paper's line numbers 1 to 25, the clerk's endorsed-filed stamp, the caption's rules, the signature, and the typist's reference "JLT/wmr". The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published. Review note: The Standing Orders page lists it under Family Law Matters as “SO - Waiver of Conflict/Temporary Judges in Family Law Department”; the caption's “CASE NO.” is the order's own file number.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.