General Order 2026-03, signed by Honorable Mark Nareau, Presiding Judge: prior to the filing of a JV-180/388 Welfare and Institution Code Petition, the proponent of the petition to meet and confer with all parties as to their consent or non-consent to the request of the Petitioner, best efforts to meet and confer required prior to the filing; the order intended to be incorporated into a future revision of the Local Rules of Court effective January 1, 2027, and upon successful incorporation deemed automatically revoked and rescinded.
California > Third Appellate District > Lassen County > Superior Court of California, County of Lassen
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LASSEN GENERAL ORDER 2026-03 JV-180/388 WIC PETITION FILINGS Prior to the filing of a JV-180/388 Welfare and Institution Code Petition, the proponent of said petition shall meet and confer with all parties as to their consent or non-consent to the request of the Petitioner prior to the filing of the Petition. Best efforts to meet and confer will be required prior to the filing of the Petition. This general order is intended to be incorporated into a future revision of the Local Rules of Court of the Superior Court of California, County of Lassen, effective January 1, 2027. Upon successful incorporation into the Local Rules of Court, this General Order shall be deemed automatically revoked and rescinded. Dated: May 11, 2026 _______________________________ Honorable Mark Nareau Presiding Judge of the Superior Court
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LASSEN GENERAL ORDER 2026-03 JV-180/388 WIC PETITION FILINGS Prior to the filing of a JV-180/388 Welfare and Institution Code Petition, the proponent of said petition shall meet and confer with all parties as to their consent or non-consent to the request of the Petitioner prior to the filing of the Petition. Best efforts to me
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Lassen build 2026-10-12) from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-lassen/docs/general-orders/general-order-2026-03.pdf (114829 bytes, sha256 bd588a411503499f288d2dbe2e4ba5af46f41d4c451a740cbda6510f5dc2d32c; 1 page; a printed text layer) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow): the one page composed; the clerk's filing stamp - scanned onto the page and turned into text by Acrobat's ClearScan, its glyphs set in fonts ClearScan synthesized (every name begins “*”), its character codes OCR guesses the line reading runs into the heading set beside it - removed as chrome by font (the composer's opt-in stamp_fonts, added for these orders; its A/B regression, custody file ab-composer-stamp-fonts.log, composes 1,387 earlier compositions unchanged) with the page number - 11 chrome items; the Presiding Judge's signature is an image above the printed name, not text; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) pass. Review note: The order is to be incorporated into the Local Rules of Court effective January 1, 2027, and is then deemed revoked and rescinded; the review task on the proposed Local Rules of Court effective January 1, 2027, which the court posts for public comment (held), re-reads this card when those rules take effect. The clerk’s filing stamp is not part of the card’s text.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.