Loading…
General Order 2026-09, signed by Mark R. Nareau, Presiding Judge: the Lassen County Probation Department to have the probation officer who authored the probation report pertaining to a Defendant subject to a sentencing hearing present for the hearing; if the author is not available, any Lassen County probation officer familiar with and able to articulate the reasons and opinions in the report may appear in their stead; the probation officer may appear in person in court or via zoom.
California > Third Appellate District > Lassen County > Superior Court of California, County of Lassen
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LASSEN GENERAL ORDER 2026-09 It is herein ordered that the Lassen County Probation Department shall have the probation officer who authored the probation report pertaining to a Defendant subject to a sentencing hearing to be present for said hearing. If the author of the report is not available, any Lassen County probation officer may appear in their stead provided said officer is familiar with and able to articulate reasons and opinions contained within the probation report. The probation officer may appear in person in court or via zoom. Dated: 9-2-2026 Mark R. Nareau Presiding Judge
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LASSEN GENERAL ORDER 2026-09 It is herein ordered that the Lassen County Probation Department shall have the probation officer who authored the probation report pertaining to a Defendant subject to a sentencing hearing to be present for said hearing. If the author of the report is not available, any Lassen County probation offi
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Lassen build 2026-10-12) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-lassen/docs/general-orders/general-order-2026-09.pdf (377079 bytes, sha256 9f021f70dde5a80246e5b737eae031d625a2cb2ab27890723bfa053d53ca7c35; 1 page; scanned page images with an invisible OCR text layer): read on the page image rendered at 200 dpi; checked against RapidOCR on the page and the file's own invisible OCR layer, never published: every 6-word window looked up, and of the 2 spans no reading holds, 2 split into pieces a reading holds (the filing stamp read into the court's heading) (vision/check-log.txt). Not part of the text: the page number; the clerk's filing stamp (“SEP 02 2026”, signed by a deputy clerk); the Presiding Judge's handwritten signature, which crosses the printed name. The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published. Review note: The order prints no title: the card’s title is the order’s name in its link on the General & Standing Orders page. Its date is typed (9-2-2026).
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.