Loading…
Effective October 10, 2017, all limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer cases must be filed in one of the eleven regional hub courthouses the order lists, by the ZIP code rules of Local Rule 2.3(a)(2); inconsistent local rules remain suspended. The table the order says is attached is not in the court's file.
California > Second Appellate District > Los Angeles County > Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles > Civil / Eviction - Unlawful Detainer (UD)
2017-GEN-020 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES RE: LIMITED JURISDICTION UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES – HUB FILING LOCATIONS 4th AMENDED GENERAL ORDER Pursuant to the authority set forth in Rule 10.603 of the California Rules of Court, and as authorized by resolutions of the Los Angeles Superior Court Executive Committee on March 21, 2012, and on February 20, 2013, acting pursuant to Local Rule 1.7(a), it is hereby ordered as follows: Any Local Rule inconsistent with the matters set forth below remains suspended as previously ordered on March 18, 2013. Effective October 10, 2017, all Los Angeles Superior Court limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer cases must be filed in a regional ‘Hub’ courthouse: downtown Los Angeles (Stanley Mosk), West Covina, Pasadena, Chatsworth, Antelope Valley (Michael D. Antonovich), Van Nuys, Long Beach (Governor George Deukmejian), Compton, Norwalk, Inglewood, and Santa Monica. Boundaries for new limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer case filing locations can be found under LASC Local Rule 2.3(a)(2) at www.lacourt.org. These are established by the U.S. Postal Service Zip Code related to the location of the property. Once the property’s U.S. Postal Service Zip Code is determined, parties should reference the attached table to determine in which Hub the case must be filed. A copy of the attached table will be posted in every courthouse in order to assist in determining the new filing location. The limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer Hub courthouses are located in: • Stanley Mosk Courthouse, 111 N. Hill Street, Los Angeles, 90012 • West Covina Courthouse, 1427 West Covina Parkway, West Covina, 91790 • Pasadena Courthouse, 300 East Walnut, Pasadena, 91101 • Chatsworth Courthouses, 9425 Penfield Avenue, Chatsworth, 91311 • Michael D. Antonovich Antelope Valley North Courthouse, 42011 Fourth Street West, Lancaster, 93534 • Van Nuys Courthouse, 6230 Sylmar Avenue, Van Nuys, 91401 • Long Beach Courthouse, 275 Magnolia Avenue, Long Beach, 90802 • Compton Courthouses, 200 W. Compton Boulevard, Compton 90220 • Norwalk Courthouse, 12720 Norwalk Boulevard, Norwalk, 90650 • Inglewood Courthouse, 110 E. Regent Street, Inglewood, 90301 • Santa Monica Courthouse, 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, 90401 This information is also available on the Los Angeles County Superior Court website at www.lacourt.org. This General Order shall be posted on the Court’s website. Effective immediately, this General Order is to remain in effect until otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 10, 2017 ____________________________________ DANIEL J. BUCKLEY Presiding Judge 4TH AMENDED GENERAL ORDER – LIMITED JURISDICTION UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES-HUB FILING LOCATIONS
2017-GEN-020 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES RE: LIMITED JURISDICTION UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES – HUB FILING LOCATIONS 4th AMENDED GENERAL ORDER Pursuant to the authority set forth in Rule 10.603 of the California Rules of Court, and as authorized by resolutions of the Los Angeles Superior Court Executive Committee on March 21, 2012, and on February 20, 2013,
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Los Angeles build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-los-angeles/general-orders/LIBWEBRESOURCE-481-4thAmendedGeneralOrderReUDHub.pdf (200357 bytes, sha256 2f4f9ca732f295f3cece264ed4e4cc7d32085f31e80d6260caa99241c1344203; 2 pages) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow), reading the glyphs drawn on the page: page numbers, pleading line numbers, the order number and running footer titles removed as chrome; the two-column pleading caption set left cell, then right cell (the “)” column and the box's rule left out); lines reflowed into the order's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only), proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) and proof 3 (same characters as the glyphs drawn on the page) all pass.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.