Loading…
The Presiding Judge delegates the assignment of judicial officers in all Judicial Council coordination proceedings to the Assistant Supervising Judge of the Civil Complex Litigation courts.
California > Second Appellate District > Los Angeles County > Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles > Civil / Civil Complex
2017-GEN-017 [File stamp: FILED, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, JUN 08 2017, Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk, By: Rizalinda Mina, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION PROCEEDINGS GENERAL ORDER From time to time, upon the granting of a petition for coordination of complex actions, the Chairperson of the Judicial Council will authorize the Presiding Judge of this Court to assign a judicial officer to hear the matter in the same manner as assignments are made in other civil cases. (Code of Civil Procedure section 404.3; Rule 3.540 of the California Rules of Court.) Pursuant to the Presiding Judge’s authority to delegate his duties to another judge pursuant to Rule 10.603 subdivision (d) of the California Rules of Court, the Presiding Judge hereby delegates responsibility for case assignments in all coordination proceedings to the Assistant Supervising Judge of the Civil Complex Litigation courts. Effective immediately, this General Order is to remain in effect until otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge. DATED: June 8, 2017 DANIEL J. BUCKLEY Presiding Judge GENERAL ORDER – JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION PROCEEDINGS
2017-GEN-017 [File stamp: FILED, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, JUN 08 2017, Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk, By: Rizalinda Mina, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION PROCEEDINGS GENERAL ORDER From time to time, upon the granting of a petition for coordination of complex actions, the Chairperso
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Los Angeles build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-los-angeles/general-orders/LIBWEBRESOURCE-332-2017-GEN-017JCCPDelegationOrder060817.pdf_search_complex.pdf (690821 bytes, sha256 76bd1d3d8ea0f6be59c52b5556e943f35ecc194222f7bc531f50b10a4add2352; 1 page) - the court's own posted PDF, a page scan: transcribed by eye from the rendered page images (200 dpi), every page read against the image; a local machine reading (RapidOCR) served only as a second reader, every six-word window of the transcription looked up in it and every miss checked on the page; the clerk's file stamp in one bracketed line, handwritten or stamped fills in place with a bracketed note, a running footer transcribed once, pleading line numbers and fill marks omitted; a signature itself is not transcribed.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.