Loading…
Effective September 19, 2025, the caption of any amended complaint or amended cross-complaint, proposed or otherwise, must name each party.
California > Second Appellate District > Los Angeles County > Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles > Civil / Unlimited Civil
2025-GEN-021-00 FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles SEPTEMBER 19, 2025 David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court By: R. Mina, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE LISTING OF ALL PARTIES IN CAPTION ON AMENDED COMPLAINTS AND CROSS-COMPLAINTS GENERAL ORDER (Effective September 19, 2025) The format of the case caption beginning on the first page of any Amended Complaint or Amended Cross-Complaint, proposed or otherwise, must contain the name of each party. This General Order is necessary to permit the Court to correctly identify the parties involved in the litigation following an amendment of the operative complaint or cross-complaint. This General Order is effective September 19, 2025, and is to remain in effect until otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 19, 2025 SERGIO C. TAPIA II Presiding Judge GENERAL ORDER RE LISTING OF ALL PARTIES IN CAPTION ON AMENDED COMPLAINTS AND CROSS-COMPLAINTS
2025-GEN-021-00 FILED Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles SEPTEMBER 19, 2025 David W. Slayton, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court By: R. Mina, Deputy SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES IN RE LISTING OF ALL PARTIES IN CAPTION ON AMENDED COMPLAINTS AND CROSS-COMPLAINTS GENERAL ORDER (Effective September 19, 2025) The format of the case caption beginn
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Los Angeles build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-los-angeles/general-orders/LIBSVCExecutiveSupport-387-2025-GEN-021-00GeneralOrderreSpecificationofAllPartiesOnAmendedComplaintsandCross-Complaint.pdf (237142 bytes, sha256 6a55640a6e774c849bbf8839e9ddb6d4a20ba5f272db5b3920352f037912d938; 1 page) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow), reading the glyphs drawn on the page: page numbers, pleading line numbers, the order number and running footer titles removed as chrome; the two-column pleading caption set left cell, then right cell (the “)” column and the box's rule left out); lines reflowed into the order's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only), proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) and proof 3 (same characters as the glyphs drawn on the page) all pass.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.