Loading…
Standing Order 2019-03 (effective October 29, 2019; an amendment to Standing Order 2009-01), the protocol for section 602/300 hearings: on a minor's detention under section 602, the Juvenile Probation Department asks the Human Services Agency (HSA) whether the minor is a dependent under section 300; if so, the Juvenile Delinquency Court suspends the proceedings and sets a section 241.1 protocol hearing on the W&I § 300 Dependency calendar within 10 days if the minor is in custody and within 15 days if not; the Dependency Clerk notices the parents, guardians, their attorneys, minor's counsel, the District Attorney's juvenile office, the Public Defender's Office if applicable, the Probation Department, and the Human Service Agency; and the Juvenile Probation Department provides the noticed parties the 241.1 report with the police reports.
California > Fifth Appellate District > Merced County > Superior Court of California, County of Merced
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MERCED 627 W. 21st Street Merced, CA 95340 STANDING ORDER #2019-03 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 29, 2019 Standing Order #2019-03 is an amendment to Standing Order #2009-01 effective January 8, 2009 and shall replace said standing order. PROTOCOL FOR WELFARE & INSTITUTION CODE § 602/300 HEARINGS Upon the detention of a minor under Welfare & Institution Code § 602, the Juvenile Probation Department shall contact the Human Services Agency (HSA) to determine whether or not that minor is currently a dependent under Welfare & Institution Code § 300. Once HSA has determined that the minor in question is currently a dependent under Welfare & Institution Code § 300 who has been detained under Welfare & Institutions Code § 602, HSA shall notify Juvenile Probation. Juvenile Probation shall document this in the new W&I § 602 file. The Juvenile Delinquency Court shall then suspend juvenile proceedings and set a date for the Welfare & Institution Code § 241.1 protocol hearing, to be heard on the W&I § 300 Dependency calendar. This hearing date shall be set within 10 days if minor is in custody; within 15 days if the minor is not in custody. The Juvenile Delinquency Court shall then notify the Dependency Division Court Processing Clerk (Dependency Clerk) in charge of the W&I § 300 calendar. The Dependency Clerk shall look up the matter and ascertain the names of all persons to be noticed, to include: parents, guardians, parents' attorney, minor's counsel, District Attorney 's Office-Juvenile, Public Defender's Office, if applicable, Probation Department, and Human Service Agency. The Dependency Clerk shall send notice of the hearing to all relevant parties listed above. The Juvenile Probation Department shall provide all of the noticed parties with a copy of the 241.1 Welfare & Institution Report with the Police Reports attached, if applicable. DONALD J. PROIETTI PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MERCED 627 W. 21st Street Merced, CA 95340 STANDING ORDER #2019-03 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 29, 2019 Standing Order #2019-03 is an amendment to Standing Order #2009-01 effective January 8, 2009 and shall replace said standing order. PROTOCOL FOR WELFARE & INSTITUTION CODE § 602/300 HEARINGS Upon the detention of a minor under Welfare & Institution Code § 602, the Ju
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-15 (California T4 Merced build 2026-10-15) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-merced/docs/general/standing-order-07072026.pdf (11638206 bytes, sha256 3a64db27e5391b6e9054feb5caef786433c02e5204366a95c135937e05e1630f; the compilation “ACTIVE STANDING ORDERS 2006 to Present”, linked as “All Current Standing Orders”; 70 pages - 36 covered by scanned page images (each with a machine reading laid with it - not a card's source), 34 born-digital (one font of the juvenile competency protocol's pages draws its characters shifted)); this order the compilation's page 24, a scanned page image: read on the page images rendered at 200 dpi (vision/img/so-p24.png), transcribed with the compilation's pages 18 to 28 and checked against a RapidOCR reading of the images (at 200 dpi) and the file's own text layer for the same pages, never published: of the transcription's 2059 words, 109 6-word windows were not found in a reading, in 23 spans - 23 spans split into consecutive pieces each found (a page break, a letterhead or signature block the readings interleave, or the readings' line order) (vision/check-log.txt; evidence/vision-check-2026-10-15.log, evidence/vision-explain-2026-10-15.log). Not part of the text: the compilation's page stamps (“N of 70”) and, where printed, the court's seal, the letterhead's upper-right block, the signature, the running footers and the order's distribution list (cc:), never content (taken out by build/normalize_transcripts.py; the transcriber's file is kept in custody). The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.