Loading…
The presiding judge of the Appellate Division orders that all oral argument be conducted, and all parties appear, by Zoom videoconference (California Rules of Court, rule 8.885(b)); oral argument remains open to the public under the court's posted access procedures; the order continues until changed or superseded by local rule.
California > Fourth Appellate District > Orange County > Superior Court of California, County of Orange
Superior Court of California County of Orange Chambers of STEPHEN K. TAMURA JUSTICE CENTER NATHAN SCOTT DEPARTMENT W-2 APPELLATE DIVISION 8141 13th STREET PRESIDING JUDGE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 PHONE: 657-622-5902 APPELLATE DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 21/01 APPELLATE DIVISION VIDEOCONFERENCING ORDER It is ordered by the presiding judge of the appellate division that all oral argument will be conducted by Zoom videoconference. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.885(b)(1)(A).) It is further ordered by the presiding judge of the appellate division that all parties will appear for oral argument by Zoom videoconference. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.885(b)(2)(B).) Persons appearing remotely shall ensure that their remote location affords the required level of privacy for the proceeding. Instructions to appear via remote technology for videoconferences in the appellate division are posted on the court’s website at https://www.occourts.org/media-relations/covid/PublicRemoteHearingInstructionsAppellate.pdf. All statutory confidentiality requirements apply to remote appearances. No party will be charged any fee to participate in oral argument by videoconference. Oral argument is open to the public. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.885(b)(2)(C).) Public access procedures are posted on the court’s website at https://www.occourts.org/media-relations/covid/PublicRemoteHearingInstructionsAppellate.pdf. Photographing, broadcasting, video recording, audio recording, electronic recording, filming, and streaming of court proceedings, whether in person or remote, is prohibited except as expressly authorized by California Rules of Court, rule 1.150, Local Rule 180, and Administrative Order 21/12. Superior Court of California December 30, 2021 County of Orange This order is effective immediately and will remain in effect until otherwise ordered by the presiding judge of the appellate division or superseded by local rule. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of December 2021, in Orange County, California. ______________________________ Nathan Scott Appellate Division Presiding Judge
Superior Court of California County of Orange Chambers of STEPHEN K. TAMURA JUSTICE CENTER NATHAN SCOTT DEPARTMENT W-2 APPELLATE DIVISION 8141 13th STREET PRESIDING JUDGE WESTMINSTER, CALIFORNIA 92683 PHONE: 657-622-5902 APPELLATE DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 21/01 APPELLATE DIVISION VIDEOCONFERENCING ORDER It is ordered by the presiding judge of the appellate division that all oral argument
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Orange build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-orange/docs/administrativeorder21_01appellatedivisionvideoconferencingorder.pdf (160636 bytes, sha256 16bcf94cc9ae90e2e0950b0c4ea9d7236479e67a361eaa13b34e66c13f6f6d4b; 2 pages) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow): page numbers and running headers or footers removed as chrome, lines reflowed into the document's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) both pass.
3 verbatim requirements on remote appearances in CALEB S. JOHNSTON's division.
6 verbatim requirements on remote appearances in MICHAEL G. KAPLAN's division.