Loading…
The juvenile court assigns juvenile justice, dependency and truancy cases on a direct calendar system, so a case assigned to a judge or commissioner stays with that officer for all purposes until jurisdiction ends unless otherwise ordered; a peremptory challenge must be made before any determination of contested issues of fact on the merits and within 15 days after notice of the assignment, and each party has one per case; the order also addresses cases accepted into the collaborative courts.
California > Fourth Appellate District > Orange County > Superior Court of California, County of Orange
[File stamp: FILED, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Lamoreaux Justice Center, Dec 03 2019, David H. Yamasaki, Clerk of the Court, By: J. Wautlet, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SITTING AS THE JUVENILE COURT AMENDED JUVENILE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 11/003-900 TITLE: ASSIGNMENT OF CASES AND PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES This court assigns juvenile justice, dependency, and truancy cases on a direct calendar system. Under this system, a case is assigned to a particular judge or commissioner for all purposes and will remain with that judicial officer until the termination of jurisdiction, unless otherwise ordered. Under the direct calendar system, a peremptory challenge to any judge or commissioner must be made prior to any determination of contested issues of fact relating to the merits, and within 15 days after notice of the assignment of the case to a specific judge or commissioner, or it will be deemed untimely. Notice of the assignment is complete upon service or initial appearance in court. Each party will be allowed only one peremptory challenge per case. If a case is accepted into the Juvenile Recovery Court, Teen Court, Youth Development Court, and/or G.R.A.C.E. (Generating Resources to Abolish Child Exploitation) Court, the case has not been reassigned for purposes of peremptory challenge. (This Order is made pursuant to Daniel V.v. Superior Court (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 28.) This Juvenile Court Administrative Order is to remain in effect until otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge of Juvenile Court. Dated this 3rd day of December, 2019 JOANNE MOTOIKE PRESIDING JUDGE OF JUVENILE COURT
[File stamp: FILED, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Lamoreaux Justice Center, Dec 03 2019, David H. Yamasaki, Clerk of the Court, By: J. Wautlet, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SITTING AS THE JUVENILE COURT AMENDED JUVENILE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 11/003-900 TITLE: ASSIGNMENT OF CASES AND PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES This court assigns juvenile justice, depen
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Orange build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-orange/docs/admin-order-11-003.pdf (57130 bytes, sha256 6caf2b251dceb89fd4becfccf5a44171e8aa682bb5bfb77a0a0c5aa5046ad8df; 1 page) - the court's own posted PDF, a scan: transcribed by eye from the rendered page images, every page read against the image; a local machine reading (RapidOCR) served only as a second reader for a word-level diff, every difference classified and checked on the page; every quotation mark, apostrophe and dash checked in full-resolution crops; file stamps, handwritten dates and pages not transcribed are recorded in bracketed notes; printed irregularities are kept as printed.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.