Loading…
The juvenile court incorporates Administrative Order No. 20/24 and its stipulation on the disclosure of evidence audit records, Remedy printouts and reports into juvenile proceedings (criminal proceedings read as juvenile cases), subject to the confidentiality of juvenile information under the Welfare and Institutions Code; the order is a standing order for all juvenile proceedings.
California > Fourth Appellate District > Orange County > Superior Court of California, County of Orange
[File stamp: FILED, Orange County Superior Court, Apr 21 2021, David H. Yamasaki, Clerk of the Court, By: R. Bracken, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SITTING AS THE JUVENILE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: A-100-1-2021 TITLE: Procedure for Disclosure of Evidence Audit Records This Order establishes the procedure for the disclosure of evidence audit records in a juvenile proceeding, incorporating by reference Administrative Order No 20/24, issued by Presiding Judge Kirk H. Nakamura on October 15, 2020. (Attachment A.) The Juvenile Court further incorporates by reference the Stipulation and Order Regarding Disclosure of Evidence Audit Records, Remedy Record Printouts and Associated Reports, attached to Administrative Order No. 20/24 and entered into by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department, by and through its attorneys, the Orange County Counsel’s Office, the Orange County District Attorney, and the Orange County Public Defender regarding disclosure of documents pertaining to the Orange County Sheriff’s Department “Evidence Audit” records, Remedy system printouts, and Orange County Sheriff’s Department reports (“DRs”) associated with entries in the Evidence Audit Records (“the Stipulation” or “the Global Stipulation”), subject to the conditions and modifications noted in this Order. The process described in the Stipulation is equally available to other defense counsel upon agreement to be bound by the terms of the applicable protective order as set forth by the Stipulation. For purposes of this Order: (1) Any reference in Administrative Order No. 20/24 or the Global Stipulation to “criminal proceedings” shall be understood to mean juvenile court proceedings; and (2) Any reference in Administrative Order No. 20/24 or the Global Stipulation to “defendant” shall be understood to mean a juvenile justice involved youth. A copy of the Stipulation and Administrative Order No. 20/24 is attached to this Order as Attachment A. Any evidence audit records disclosed in relation to a juvenile proceeding may contain confidential information subject to the protections of Welfare and Institution Code section 827. If there is information found within the records that is protected confidential information, the attorney of record for the youth shall not share or disseminate the protected information except to entitled parties as enumerated under Welfare and Institutions Code section 827. This Order does not prevent any party from seeking records otherwise permitted by law. This Order may be considered a “standing order” and is applicable to all juvenile proceedings in the Orange County Superior Court. This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until modified by further Order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 4.21.21 JOANNE MOTOIKE Presiding Judge of the Juvenile Court [The date is handwritten. The court's file is these two pages; Attachment A (Administrative Order No. 20/24 with the Stipulation) is not in it. Administrative Order No. 20/24 is carded separately.]
[File stamp: FILED, Orange County Superior Court, Apr 21 2021, David H. Yamasaki, Clerk of the Court, By: R. Bracken, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE SITTING AS THE JUVENILE COURT ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: A-100-1-2021 TITLE: Procedure for Disclosure of Evidence Audit Records This Order establishes the procedure for the disclosure of evidence audit records in a juvenile proceedin
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Orange build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-orange/docs/admin-order-100-1-2021.pdf (219601 bytes, sha256 46efc2913b48028830d246e362c50157786ecf4e4dc4da6bf8ce19a778cfa995; 2 pages) - the court's own posted PDF, a scan: transcribed by eye from the rendered page images, every page read against the image; a local machine reading (RapidOCR) served only as a second reader for a word-level diff, every difference classified and checked on the page; every quotation mark, apostrophe and dash checked in full-resolution crops; file stamps, handwritten dates and pages not transcribed are recorded in bracketed notes; printed irregularities are kept as printed. Its Attachment A (Administrative Order No. 20/24 with the stipulation) is not in the court's file; Administrative Order No. 20/24 is carded.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.