Loading…
For good cause, the Social Services Agency may reproduce CII criminal history information in its court reports in 8.5-point type rather than the 12-point minimum of rule 2.104, to shorten the reports.
California > Fourth Appellate District > Orange County > Superior Court of California, County of Orange
Superior Court of California County of Orange Chambers of MARIA D. HERNANDEZ PRESIDING JUDGE OF JUVENILE COURT 341 THE CITY DRIVE ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: (657) 622-5502 Orange County Juvenile Court Administrative Order A-400-1-2014 Re: Criminal Identification and Information (CII) Report Font Size Reduction in Social Services Agency (SSA) Court Reports California Rules of Court, rule 2.104 calls for a font size of not smaller than 12 points for papers filed in trial court. In order to shorten the criminal history section contained within Social Services Agency (SSA) court reports by 27% and save paper, SSA requested leave to reduce to 8.5 the font size used when reproducing information copied from the State Department of Justice’s Criminal Identification and Information (CII) reports. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN THEREFOR, SSA is hereby authorized to reduce the font size used when reproducing CII information in SSA Court Reports from a 12-point font to an 8.5-point font. This Juvenile Court Administrative Order is to remain in effect until otherwise ordered by the Presiding Judge of the Juvenile Court. Dated this 18th day of November 2014. Maria Hernandez Presiding Judge of Juvenile Court
Superior Court of California County of Orange Chambers of MARIA D. HERNANDEZ PRESIDING JUDGE OF JUVENILE COURT 341 THE CITY DRIVE ORANGE, CA 92868 PHONE: (657) 622-5502 Orange County Juvenile Court Administrative Order A-400-1-2014 Re: Criminal Identification and Information (CII) Report Font Size Reduction in Social Services Agency (SSA) Court Reports California Rules of Court, rule 2.104 calls f
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Orange build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-orange/docs/notice_of_intent_to_issue_a-400-1-2014_cci_font_size_reduction.pdf (42007 bytes, sha256 e687585ff9230a2cb3e89c592b74454d1bb4a0245426b3182bb3f9a64e9c5d71; 1 page) - the court's own posted PDF, a scan: transcribed by eye from the rendered page images, every page read against the image; a local machine reading (RapidOCR) served only as a second reader for a word-level diff, every difference classified and checked on the page; every quotation mark, apostrophe and dash checked in full-resolution crops; file stamps, handwritten dates and pages not transcribed are recorded in bracketed notes; printed irregularities are kept as printed.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.