The Probate bench's statement that repeated continuances to clear probate notes are interfering with the court's calendars: if notes are not cleared by the third continuance, depending on the matter, the petition may be dismissed without prejudice and the petitioner required to pay the filing fee to re-file, or an appointed personal representative, conservator or guardian may be suspended and an order to show cause re removal set; delays caused by the court's own backlog in approving orders and letters will be accommodated.
California > Fourth Appellate District > Orange County > Superior Court of California, County of Orange
Superior Court of California County of Orange Probate’s Statement on Continuances February 2021 As most counsel are aware, the Court’s calendars have increased exponentially during the pandemic. Many of those calendars reflect multiple continuances for notes to be cleared. In an effort to reduce calendar size and clear the Court’s backlog, the following policy is now in effect: “If notes have not been cleared by the third continuance, and depending on the matter before the Court, the petition may be dismissed without prejudice and the party bringing the petition may be required to pay the filing fee to re-file or an appointed personal representative, conservator or guardian may be suspended and an OSC re removal set.” This action is not taken lightly. The number of continuances occurring due to failure to clear notes has begun to interfere with the court’s ability to process, schedule and approve the matters which otherwise could be more quickly set for hearing. Matters continued multiple times for failure to clear notes should not prevent the approval of petitions which have been properly submitted. We acknowledge that some delays are caused by the significant back log in approving orders, letters, etc. In those cases, we will try and continue the matter out far enough that those submitted documents can be reviewed and, hopefully, approved so that another appearance is not necessary.
Superior Court of California County of Orange Probate’s Statement on Continuances February 2021 As most counsel are aware, the Court’s calendars have increased exponentially during the pandemic. Many of those calendars reflect multiple continuances for notes to be cleared. In an effort to reduce calendar size and clear the Court’s backlog, the following policy is now in effect: “If notes have not
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-29 (California T3 Orange build 2026-09-29) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-orange/docs/statement_on_continuances.pdf (94699 bytes, sha256 6848fea19100ec5db3e9b81bf14fb9ff662a9ca7392a4bbc4baf627fd5bf6744; 1 page) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow): page numbers and running headers or footers removed as chrome, lines reflowed into the document's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) both pass.
6 verbatim requirements on divisional requirements in GIUSEPPINA MIRANDA's division.
4 verbatim requirements on divisional requirements in HILARY CREARY's division.
2 verbatim requirements on divisional requirements in NATASHA DEPRIMO's division.