Loading…
Administrative Order #26-01, signed by Douglas Prouty, Presiding Judge, and William Abramson, Assistant Presiding Judge: effective this date and continuing until further order, the use of body-worn cameras within the Superior Court facilities located in the Plumas County Courthouse by the public prohibited - all courtrooms, Clerk’s offices, judicial chambers, the third floor conference room, and any and all attendant hallways and rooms; law enforcement and security officers permitted to wear body-worn cameras there, off, on standby or inactive, and to create a recording only if the officer is conducting law enforcement activities or assisting with an arrest, interacting with an individual who is not complying with a command from the officer or judicial officer, responding to an emergency situation, or has received prior permission from the Presiding Judge; a recording created during juvenile proceedings subject to Welfare and Institutions Code section 827 and California Rules of Court rule 5.552; law enforcement activating a body-worn camera in the facilities notifying the Sheriff’s Department and Court Executive Officer as soon as practical.
California > Third Appellate District > Plumas County > Superior Court of California, County of Plumas
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF PLUMAS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER #26-01 USE OF BODY WORN CAMERAS WITHIN THE PLUMAS SUPERIOR COURT FACILITIES LOCATED IN THE PLUMAS COUNTY COURTHOUSE Effective this date and continuing until further order, the use of body-worn cameras within the Superior Court facilities located in the Plumas County Courthouse by the public is prohibited. Those Superior Court facilities include all courtrooms, Clerk’s offices, judicial chambers, third floor conference room, and any and all attendant hallways and rooms. Law enforcement and security officers are permitted to wear body-worn cameras within the Superior Court facilities. Law enforcement and security officer body-worn cameras shall be off, on standby or inactive. Permitted Use: Law enforcement and security officers may use body-worn camera within the Superior Court facilities to create a recording only if the officer is conducting law enforcement activities or assisting with an arrest, interacting with an individual who is not complying with a command from the officer or judicial officer, is responding to an emergency situation, or has received prior permission from the Presiding Judge. If law enforcement or security are present during juvenile proceedings and a recording is created as permitted above, they must comply with Welfare and Institutions Code section 827 and California Rules of Court rule 5.552. If law enforcement activates a body-worn camera while in the Superior Court facilities, they shall notify the Sheriff’s Department and Court Executive Officer as soon as practical. Dated: Douglas Prouty Presiding Judge William Abramson Assistant Presiding Judge
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF PLUMAS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER #26-01 USE OF BODY WORN CAMERAS WITHIN THE PLUMAS SUPERIOR COURT FACILITIES LOCATED IN THE PLUMAS COUNTY COURTHOUSE Effective this date and continuing until further order, the use of body-worn cameras within the Superior Court facilities located in the Plumas County Courthouse by the public is prohibited. Those Superior Court facil
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Plumas build 2026-10-12) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-plumas/docs/administrative-orders/administrative-order-26-01.pdf (227859 bytes, sha256 a5677697aa67409ba53331c84fb92da7a422105758a43035565c405811ec71f5; 1 page; page images, no text layer): read on the page image rendered at 200 dpi; checked against RapidOCR on the page (the scan carries no text layer of its own), never published: every 6-word window looked up, and of the 2 spans the reading does not hold, 1 split into pieces the reading holds (the filing stamp at the height of the court's name and the order's number) and 1 read again on the page image (the printed name “Douglas Prouty”, which the Presiding Judge's signature crosses (read “Douglas Proufy”), with the handwritten date read into the date line) (vision/check-log.txt). Not part of the text: the clerk's filing stamp (“MAY 05 2026”, initialed by a deputy clerk); the date written by hand on the date line and the two judges' handwritten signatures, which cross the printed names. The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.