Loading…
Administrative Order #26-03, signed by Hon. Douglas Prouty, Presiding Judge, and Hon. William Abramson, Assistant Presiding Judge: it being difficult to secure Judicial Officers due to the court’s remote location and at times inclement weather, Judicial Officers hearing cases on assignment can appear remotely in all case types unless the Presiding Judge finds good cause that the Judicial Officer appear in person; in effect until modified or revoked.
California > Third Appellate District > Plumas County > Superior Court of California, County of Plumas
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF PLUMAS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER #26-03 JUDICIAL OFFICERS APPEARING REMOTELY As with many rural counties, it is difficult to secure Judicial Officers due to the court’s remote location and at times inclement weather necessitating the need for Remote Appearances. The court orders that Judicial Officers hearing cases on assignment can appear remotely in all case types unless the Presiding Judge finds good cause that the Judicial Officer appear in person. This order remains in effect until modified or revoked. Dated: Hon. Douglas Prouty Presiding Judge Hon. William Abramson Assistant Presiding Judge
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF PLUMAS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER #26-03 JUDICIAL OFFICERS APPEARING REMOTELY As with many rural counties, it is difficult to secure Judicial Officers due to the court’s remote location and at times inclement weather necessitating the need for Remote Appearances. The court orders that Judicial Officers hearing cases on assignment can appear remotely in all case typ
Reviewer note: Transcribed 2026-10-12 (California T4 Plumas build 2026-10-12) by eye from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-plumas/docs/administrative-orders/administrative-order-26-03_1.pdf (155745 bytes, sha256 4447f332385bd396267e140942c23ba419938e8e22e53bfa804fb24e18fb2c7d; 1 page; page images, no text layer): read on the page image rendered at 200 dpi; checked against RapidOCR on the page (the scan carries no text layer of its own), never published: every 6-word window looked up, and of the 2 spans the reading does not hold, 2 split into pieces the reading holds (the filing stamp at the heading's height, and the signature block's lines read apart) (vision/check-log.txt). Not part of the text: the clerk's filing stamp (“AUG 07 2026”, initialed by a deputy clerk); the date written by hand on the date line and the two judges' handwritten signatures, which cross the printed names. The transcription's closing note, which describes the pages, is not published.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.