Loading…
Amendment of Local Rule 5.4.1.C (domestic violence restraining order hearings): written rescheduling requests use Request to Continue Hearing (JC Form DV-115) with the top of Order on Request to Continue Court Hearing (DV-116) completed; for oral requests parties are encouraged to submit the DV-116 with its top portion completed. In effect for 2026.
California > Fourth Appellate District > San Diego County > Superior Court of California, County of San Diego
[File stamp: FILED, Clerk of the Superior Court, DEC 31 2025, By: G. Arce-Barraza, Deputy] THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO IN RE AMENDMENT TO SAN DIEGO LOCAL RULE 5.4.1 GENERAL ORDER OF THE PRESIDING DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. 010126-33 THIS COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to the authority set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 10.603, the court hereby amends San Diego Local Rules, rule 5.4.1.C, as follows: Rule 5.4.1 Domestic Violence Restraining Order Hearings . . . C. Forms. All written rescheduling requests must be submitted on the mandatory form Request to Continue Hearing (JC Form #DV-115) and have completed the top portion of the mandatory form Order on Request to Continue Court Hearing (JC Form #DV-116). For oral rescheduling requests, parties are encouraged to submit the mandatory form Order on Request to Continue Court Hearing (JC Form #DV-116) with the top portion completed. . . . This order shall become effective on January 1, 2026, and expire on December 31, 2026, unless otherwise ordered by this court. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 31, 2025 [signature] HONORABLE MAUREEN F. HALLAHAN PRESIDING JUDGE
[File stamp: FILED, Clerk of the Superior Court, DEC 31 2025, By: G. Arce-Barraza, Deputy] THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO IN RE AMENDMENT TO SAN DIEGO LOCAL RULE 5.4.1 GENERAL ORDER OF THE PRESIDING DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. 010126-33 THIS COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Pursuant to the authority set forth in California Rules of Court, rule 10.603, the court hereby
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-28 (California T3 San Diego build) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-san-diego/go/general_order_010126-33.pdf (53620 bytes, sha256 a129a3331efa0de290837e3f65b11354750fe1a0d426921e03298c01227cd355; 2 pages) - the court's own posted PDF, a scan with no usable text layer: transcribed from the rendered page images, every page read against the image; a machine reading (RapidOCR) was used only as a second reader for a word-level diff; every quotation mark, apostrophe, dash and section sign checked in full-resolution crops; pleading line numbers and “///” fill marks omitted; the file stamp and signature bracketed. Printed irregularities are kept as printed.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.