Loading…
The package plaintiff must serve on each defendant with the complaint (and cross-complainants on new parties) under CRC 3.221(c): the court's ADR options for general civil cases - mandatory settlement conferences (Local Rule 5.0), mediation through the Bar Association of San Francisco (an administrative fee of$295 per party), the Judicial Mediation Program, private mediation and Community Boards ($45-$100 to open a case), and judicial arbitration (CCP 1141.11; $50,000 or less) and private arbitration; and how to take part - a Stipulation to ADR, the case management statement or contacting the ADR department.
California > First Appellate District > San Francisco County > Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco Alternative Dispute Resolution Information Package The plaintiff must serve a copy of the ADR Information Package on each defendant along with the complaint. Cross-complainants must serve a copy of the ADR Information Package on any new parties to the action together with the cross-complaint. (CRC 3.221(c).) WHAT IS ADR? Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is the term used to describe the various options available for settling a dispute without a trial. There are many different ADR processes, the most common forms of which are mediation, arbitration and settlement conferences. In ADR, trained, impartial people decide disputes or help parties decide disputes themselves. They can help parties resolve disputes without having to go to trial. WHY CHOOSE ADR? It is the policy of the Superior Court that every long cause, non-criminal, non-juvenile case should participate either in an early settlement conference, mediation, arbitration, early neutral evaluation or some other alternative dispute resolution process prior to trial. (Local Rule 4.) ADR can have a number of advantages over traditional litigation: • ADR can save time. A dispute often can be resolved in a matter of months, even weeks, through ADR, while a lawsuit can take years. • ADR can save money, including court costs, attorney fees, and expert fees. • ADR encourages participation. The parties may have more opportunities to tell their story than in court and may have more control over the outcome of the case. • ADR is more satisfying. For all the above reasons, many people participating in ADR have reported a high degree of satisfaction. **Electing to participate in an ADR process does not stop the time period to respond to a complaint or cross-complaint** WHAT ARE THE ADR OPTIONS? The San Francisco Superior Court offers different types of ADR processes for general civil matters. The programs are described below: 1) MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCES Settlement conferences are appropriate in any case where settlement is an option. The goal of settlement conferences is to provide participants an opportunity to reach a mutually acceptable settlement that resolves all or part of a dispute. Mandatory settlement conferences are ordered by the court and are often held near the date a case is set for trial, although they may be held earlier if appropriate. A party may elect to apply to the Presiding Judge for a specially set mandatory settlement conference by filing an ex parte application. See Local Rule 5.0 for further instructions. Upon approval by the Presiding Judge, the court will schedule the conference and assign a settlement conference officer. 2) MEDIATION Mediation is a voluntary, flexible, and confidential process in which a neutral third party facilitates negotiations. The goal of mediation is to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement that resolves all or part of a dispute after exploring the interests, needs, and priorities of the parties in light of relevant evidence and the law. (A) MEDIATION SERVICES OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO (BASF): The ADR DEPARTMENT OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO (BASF), in cooperation with the Superior Court, is designed to help civil litigants resolve disputes before they incur substantial costs in litigation. BASF’s panel of experienced, professional and impartial mediators work with parties to help them arrive at mutually agreeable solutions. Parties can select their mediator from the website www.sfbar.org/mediation or BASF can assist with mediator selection. BASF pre‐screens all mediators based upon strict educational and experience requirements and handles administrative matters, including conflict checks and case management. BASF charges an initial fee of $295 per party, which covers (1) BASF’s administration costs, (2) the first hour of preparation time, and (3) the first two hours of mediation time. Mediation time beyond that is charged at the mediator’s hourly rate, which varies depending on the mediator selected. Waivers of BASF’s fee are available to those who qualify. For more information, call 415‐982‐1600 or email adr@sfbar.org. (B) JUDICIAL MEDIATION PROGRAM provides mediation with a San Francisco Superior Court judge for civil cases, which include but are not limited to, personal injury, construction defect, employment, professional malpractice, insurance coverage, toxic torts and industrial accidents. Parties may utilize this program at any time throughout the litigation process. Parties interested in judicial mediation should file a Stipulation to Judicial Mediation indicating a joint request for inclusion in the program. A preference for a specific judge may be indicated. The court will coordinate assignment of cases for the program. There is no charge. Information about the Judicial Mediation Program may be found by visiting the ADR page on the court’s website: https://sf.courts.ca.gov/divisions/civil-division/alternative-dispute-resolution (C) PRIVATE MEDIATION: Although not currently a part of the court’s ADR program, parties may select any private mediator of their choice. The selection and coordination of private mediation is the responsibility of the parties. Parties may find mediators and organizations on the Internet. The cost of private mediation will vary depending on the mediator selected. (D) COMMUNITY BOARDS MEDIATION SERVICES: Mediation services are offered by Community Boards (CB), a nonprofit resolution center, under the Dispute Resolution Programs Act. CB utilizes a three-person panel mediation process in which mediators work as a team to assist the parties in reaching a shared solution. To the extent possible, mediators are selected to reflect the demographics of the disputants. CB has a success rate of 85% for parties reaching a resolution and a consumer satisfaction rate of 99%. The fee is $45-$100 to open a case, and an hourly rate of $180 for complex cases. Reduction and waiver of the fee are available. For more information, call 415-920-3820 or visit communityboards.org. 3) ARBITRATION An arbitrator is a neutral attorney who presides at a hearing where the parties present evidence through exhibits and testimony. The arbitrator applies the law to the facts of the case and makes an award based upon the merits of the case. (A) JUDICIAL ARBITRATION When the court orders a case to arbitration it is called "judicial arbitration". The goal of arbitration is to provide parties with an adjudication that is earlier, faster, less formal, and usually less expensive than a trial. Pursuant to CCP 1141.11, all civil actions in which the amount in controversy is $50,000 or less, and no party seeks equitable relief, shall be ordered to arbitration. (Upon stipulation of all parties, other civil matters may be submitted to judicial arbitration.) An arbitrator is chosen from the court’s arbitration panel. Arbitrations are generally held between 7 and 9 months after a complaint has been filed. Judicial arbitration is not binding unless all parties agree to be bound by the arbitrator's decision. Any party may request a trial within 60 days after the arbitrator’s award has been filed. Local Rule 4.1 allows for mediation in lieu of judicial arbitration, so long as the parties file a stipulation to mediate after being assigned to judicial arbitration. There is no cost to the parties for judicial arbitration. (B) PRIVATE ARBITRATION Although not currently a part of the court's ADR program, civil disputes may also be resolved through private arbitration. Here, the parties voluntarily consent to arbitration. If all parties agree, private arbitration may be binding and the parties give up the right to judicial review of the arbitrator's decision. In private arbitration, the parties select a private arbitrator and are responsible for paying the arbitrator's fees. HOW DO I PARTICIPATE IN ADR? Litigants may elect to participate in ADR at any point in a case. General civil cases may voluntarily enter into the court’s or court-affiliated ADR programs by any of the following means: • Filing a Stipulation to ADR: Complete and file the Stipulation form (attached to this packet and available on the court’s website); or • Indicating your ADR preferences on the Case Management Statement (available on the court’s website); or • Contacting the court’s ADR Department (see below), the Bar Association of San Francisco’s ADR Services, or Community Boards. For more information about ADR programs or dispute resolution alternatives, contact: Superior Court Alternative Dispute Resolution 400 McAllister Street, Room 103-A, San Francisco, CA 94102 adrcoordinator@sft.org Or, visit the court’s ADR page at https://sf.courts.ca.gov/divisions/civil-division/alternative-dispute-resolution TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY OF THE COURT'S ADR PROGRAMS, PLEASE COMPLETE AND FILE THE ATTACHED STIPULATION TO ADR AND SUBMIT IT TO THE COURT. YOU MUST ALSO CONTACT BASF OR COMMUNITY BOARDS TO ENROLL IN THEIR LISTED PROGRAMS. THE COURT DOES NOT FORWARD COPIES OF STIPULATIONS TO BASF OR COMMUNITY BOARDS. ADR-1 09/24 Page | 1
Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco Alternative Dispute Resolution Information Package The plaintiff must serve a copy of the ADR Information Package on each defendant along with the complaint. Cross-complainants must serve a copy of the ADR Information Package on any new parties to the action together with the cross-complaint. (CRC 3.221(c).) WHAT IS ADR? Alternative Dispute Res
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-10-08 (California T4 San Francisco build 2026-10-08) from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-san-francisco/docs/general/adr-packet-final-september-2024_0_0.pdf (377527 bytes, sha256 c6373ae16cf8676df36ec6dc8a9d564ed86a2d2e49a72e9d66729c354a9e4925; 4 pages) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow): page marks and running headers or footers removed as chrome; lines reflowed into the document's paragraphs; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) pass. Documented settings (whitespace-only or same-character changes; the proofs hold): pages 1 to 3 only (page 4 is the Stipulation to Alternative Dispute Resolution, ADR-2, a form). Review note: The ADR page says “The Judicial Mediation Program has been suspended for the time being”, while this package still describes the program (a review task). Page 4, the Stipulation to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR-2), is a form and not part of the card. Published as printed: “adrcoordinator@sft.org”; “fee of$295”.
1 verbatim mandatory provision from 13-16-s.
2 verbatim mandatory provisions from 15-41-s.
43 verbatim mandatory provisions from 07-33-s.