Loading…
Rescinds the court's General Order of November 14, 2024 on operating electronic recording equipment for specified proceedings involving fundamental liberty interests when no court reporter is available; the court will follow Family Violence Appellate Project v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (S288176), issued August 10, 2026.
California > Sixth Appellate District > Santa Clara County > Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
[File stamp: FILED, AUG 14 2026, Clerk of the Court, Superior Court of CA County of Santa Clara, By: Melanie Bueno, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ORDER RESCINDING THE GENERAL ORDER RE OPERATION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT FOR SPECIFIED PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTY INTERESTS IN THE ABSENCE OF AN AVAILABLE COURT REPORTER The General Order re Operation of Electronic Recording Equipment for Specified Proceedings Involving Fundamental Liberty Interests in the Absence of an Available Court Reporter, filed November 14, 2024, is hereby rescinded. The Court will follow the opinion in Family Violence Appellate Project et al. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County et al. (S288176) issued August 10, 2026. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 14, 2026 [signature] HON. JULIE A. EMEDE JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
[File stamp: FILED, AUG 14 2026, Clerk of the Court, Superior Court of CA County of Santa Clara, By: Melanie Bueno, Deputy] SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ORDER RESCINDING THE GENERAL ORDER RE OPERATION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT FOR SPECIFIED PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING FUNDAMENTAL LIBERTY INTERESTS IN THE ABSENCE OF AN AVAILABLE COURT REPORTER The General Order re Operation
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-28 (California T3 Santa Clara build 2026-09-28) from BenchPath custody ca/t3/ca-santa-clara/recission-general-order-re-er.pdf (332858 bytes, sha256 a16cefec4e7a12ede5aaecfbe9f9040cf82eaf15163ad77aacc83309fde7b9bb; 1 page) - the court's own posted PDF, a scan (any OCR text layer was not relied on): transcribed from the rendered page images, every page read against the image; a machine reading (RapidOCR) was used only as a second reader for a word-level diff, every difference classified (pleading line numbers, page numbers and the running footer omitted as chrome); every quotation mark, apostrophe and section sign checked in full-resolution crops; the file stamp and the signature are bracketed. The running footer prints “ORDER RESCINDING STANDING ORDER RE OPERATION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDING EQUIPMENT” while the caption says “GENERAL ORDER”; the footer is omitted as chrome. Printed irregularities are kept as printed.
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.