Loading…
10.00.0 Court Communication Regarding Restraining Orders: until the Court has a case management system capable of automatically coordinating domestic violence-related orders, its criminal, family and juvenile departments to communicate with one another, to the best of their abilities, to identify families with existing orders (10.01.0); no department of the family or juvenile court to issue a protective order or custody order in conflict with an order of the criminal court, and the orders of the criminal court to control if such an order is issued inadvertently (10.02.0); upon notice of an existing criminal protective order, the family or juvenile court to refer the parties requesting custody and visitation orders to the criminal court, where the person restrained or protected by the order may request a hearing to modify it to expand or restrict contact between the restrained person and his or her children, and the Court, when it makes a custody and visitation order in a family law case after a criminal protective order has issued, explaining to the parties that the family law order cannot be enforced by law enforcement unless the criminal protective order is modified to include its terms (10.03.0); and a family or juvenile court order that may coexist with a criminal protective order, any order that permits contact between the restrained person and his or her children providing for the safe exchange of the children and containing no language, printed or handwritten, that violates a no-contact order issued by a criminal court, a criminal court issuing a protective order after having knowledge of existing child custody and visitation orders to indicate on the order that contact and visitation are pursuant to orders previously made by the family or juvenile court, the safety of all parties the Court’s paramount concern, and the family or juvenile court to specify the time(s), day(s), place(s) and manner of transfer of the child(ren) as provided in Family Code section 3100 (10.04.0)
California > Fifth Appellate District > Tuolumne County > Superior Court of California, County of Tuolumne
10.00.0 COURT COMMUNICATION REGARDING RESTRAINING ORDERS 10.01.0 Court Communications: Until the Court has a case management system capable of automatically coordinating domestic violence-related orders, the Court’s criminal, family, and juvenile departments shall, to the best of their abilities, communicate with one another to identify families with existing orders. (Amended 7/01/16; effective 7/01/10) 10.02.0 Avoiding Conflicting Orders: No department of the family or juvenile court shall issue a protective order or custody order in conflict with an order of the criminal court. In the event such an order is issued inadvertently, the orders of the criminal court shall control. (Amended 7/01/16; effective 7/01/10) 10.03.0 Modification of Criminal Protective Order: a. Upon receiving notice of an existing criminal protective order, the family or juvenile court shall refer the parties requesting custody and visitation orders to the criminal court. There, the person restrained or protected by a criminal protective order may request a hearing to modify the criminal protective order to expand or restrict contact between the person restrained by the order and his or her children. b. The Court may make a custody and visitation order in a family law case after a criminal protective order has issued. The Court shall explain to the parties that the family law order cannot be enforced by law enforcement unless the criminal protective order is modified to include the terms of the custody and visitation order. (Amended 7/01/16; effective 7/01/10) 10.04.0 Coexisting Criminal and Family or Juvenile Court Orders: A family or juvenile court order may coexist with a criminal protective order, subject to the following conditions: a. Any order that permits contact between the restrained person and his or her children shall provide for the safe exchange of the children and shall not contain language, either printed or handwritten, that violates a no-contact order issued by a criminal court. b. After having knowledge of existing child custody and visitation orders, a criminal court issuing a protective order shall indicate on the order that contact and visitation between the restrained person and his or her children is pursuant to orders previously made by the family or juvenile court. c. Safety of all parties shall be the Court’s paramount concern. The family or juvenile court shall specify the time(s), day(s), place(s), and manner of transfer of the child(ren) as provided in Family Code section 3100. (Amended 7/01/16; effective 7/01/10)
10.00.0 COURT COMMUNICATION REGARDING RESTRAINING ORDERS 10.01.0 Court Communications: Until the Court has a case management system capable of automatically coordinating domestic violence-related orders, the Court’s criminal, family, and juvenile departments shall, to the best of their abilities, communicate with one another to identify families with existing orders. (Amended 7/01/16; effective 7/
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-10-15 (California T4 Tuolumne build 2026-10-15) from BenchPath custody ca/t4/ca-tuolumne/docs/local-rules/local-rules-effective-aug-27-2026.pdf (the court's rule book, its cover “TUOLUMNE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT LOCAL RULES OF COURT EFFECTIVE AUGUST 27, 2026”, as fetched 2026-10-15; 1761964 bytes, sha256 d8dd3a98b9379c23580021b0a984d40fbc1adb83653c5e17edbe95a1fc3e27f2; 73 pages; this part PDF page 55, page number 55) with the shared verbatim composer (v2 reflow): the rules (PDF pages 11 to 57) composed as one text and cut at the twelve chapter headings (“1.00.0 DIVISION OF BUSINESS AND GENERAL RULES” to “12.00.0 WRITS AND APPEALS”), each matched once as a whole line, one card per chapter; the book's caption above the first chapter (“SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA / COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE / --o0o-- / RULES OF COURT - JANUARY 1, 2020”) cut out as a part of its own and held - a caption, not a rule; every page's running head (“LOCAL RULES - SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE”, named), page number and the five “///” continuation marks removed as chrome - 99 chrome lines; lines reflowed into the rules' paragraphs, each chapter and rule number and lettered or numbered subdivision starting a line; 2 whitespace-only fixes (build/book-fixes.json: Rule 2.06.0's three case management plans, printed one to a line, split back onto their lines); the vertical-gap, short-line, page-break, false-break, structural-break and row-join audits (review/book-extra-audits-2026-10-15.txt and the two audits' runs) list candidates read one by one (build/book_fixes.py) - the rest kept as printed; proof 1 (whitespace-only) and proof 2 (same character multiset as the text layer minus chrome) pass. The cover (PDF page 1), the list of the court's officers (2), the instructions (3), the table of contents (4 to 10), the appendix page (58: Form TUO-TRF-100, revised June 9, 2015, printed as a page image over an earlier edition's index that stays in the text layer), the Approved Local Forms by Name (59 to 64), the Alphabetical Subject Matter Index (65 to 70) and the Table of Authorities (71 to 73) belong to no card. Review note: Rule 10.01.0 applies “Until the Court has a case management system capable of automatically coordinating domestic violence-related orders”; the book does not say whether that condition has been met.
Division XI: information forms for data processing (Rule 11.2); required action - action taken on all calendared cases and a future date always set (Rule 11.19); and pro tem judges - an attorney named as a plaintiff in a civil or small claims case may not sit as a judge pro-tem during the case or within six months following its resolution, nor one named as a defendant in two or more such cases (Rule 11.22). Rules 11.1, 11.3 to 11.5, 11.7 to 11.18, 11.20 and 11.21 are repealed, and Rule 11.6 (voluntary arbitration; see Local Rule 10.2) was repealed and renumbered.
Duval County's indigent-defense and magistration rules under the Texas Fair Defense Act (S.B. 7): who may be booked into the county jail and on what paper; arrest-case numbering; presentment to a magistrate within 48 hours (art. 15.16); the magistrate's warnings, counsel inquiry, interpreter duty, indigence determination and appointment of counsel within 24 hours of a request; the alternative appointment plan under art. 26.04(g)-(h) with annual applications, seven attorney categories (capital, first and second degree, third degree/state jail/misdemeanor, competency, appeals, post-conviction, extradition), CLE and experience standards, random rotation within each category, written acceptance within 48 hours, first contact by the end of the next working day, replacement and suspension of counsel, fee applications within five days of completing services and the compensation attachment ($500 pleas; $175/$150 hourly; $1,400 per jury-trial day; appellate caps); bail schedules by offense class with a personal bond office (fee $20 or 3%), pre-trial supervision and revocation hearings within two working days; arraignment settings and notice; repeal of conflicting rules.