Loading…
5 verbatim mandatory provisions from A-2013-006.
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • Overby, 592 So. 2d 774, 776 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (explaining that "a party may not bring an attorney into a case after it has been assigned to a judge, and then move to disqualify the judge on grounds that the judge has a bias against the attorney.") The entry ofthis administrative order is not intended to suggest that any attorney who is the subject of a standing recusal order or standing recusal administrative order has acted inappropriately. • Because a subject attorney is professionally obligated to notify a client of the existence of a standing recusal order or a standing recusal administrative order between the subject attorney and the subject judge and may not interject conflict into a case, if a subject attorney appears in a proceeding pending before a subject judge after the party's first pleading or paper is filed and served, the clerk is directed to not automatically reassign the proceeding to another division. • Standing Recusal Orders Amended This administrative order amends all standing recusal orders entered prior to the effective date of this administrative order and all future standing recusal orders. • Previous Standing Recusal Administrative Orders Amended This administrative order amends all standing recusal administrative orders entered prior to the effective date of this administrative order. • According to the records in the custody of the court's general counsel office, the following standing recusal administrative orders were entered prior to the effective date of this administrative order and are therefore amended:
Overby, 592 So. 2d 774, 776 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (explaining that "a party may not bring an attorney into a case after it has been assigned to a judge, and then move to disqualify the judge on grounds that the judge has a bias against the attorney.") The entry ofthis administrative order is not intended to suggest that any attorney who is the subject of a standing recusal order or standing recusal administrative order has acted inappropriately.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 0ec6779e839e4751440d0fe59bdb4c3217971c49b90fec641cd82aaf6d14ce4d (242245 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
The 17th Circuit's circuit-wide AI disclosure/certification mandate (Jan 2026, twice amended) was VACATED in its entirety effective June 15, 2026 by Chief Judge Phillips's AO 2026-19-Gen, expressly citing the statewide framework (AOSC26-12; Rule 2.515(d)(2), SC2026-0673). Several division procedure pages still cite the vacated order.
Every circuit-civil case reviewed within 120 days of commencement and assigned a track (complex, streamlined, or general); case management orders required; firm continuance policy; sanctions for missed deadlines. Rescinds AO 21-09.
Circuit-civil hearing-availability standards: motion calendars ~2 weeks from request; 15-30 min special sets within 45-60 days; longer special sets scale.