Loading…
4 verbatim mandatory provisions from S-2006-146.
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • The Clerk shall assign an alpha-numeric designation to the Clerk's administrative file that is unique and different from all other types of court file numbers. • The Clerk shall index the Clerk's administrative file as required by law. 2. • Docketing and Filing of Documents Every court-related document received or generated by the Clerk, including any resulting order issued by the court, that is not associated with an existing court case file ( ( -- 1 of 2 -- shall be docketed and filed in the Clerk's administrative file for the calendar year when it is received or generated. • If any document filed in the Clerk's administrative file can thereafter be associated with a court case file, such document shall be transferred to the associated court file with a docket entry noting the transfer and the court case file identification. 3.
The Clerk shall assign an alpha-numeric designation to the Clerk's administrative file that is unique and different from all other types of court file numbers.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 23c081cc4cad43b7af32a144d650f6816f78efbecd5f8ac885bc460d3305bba2 (88174 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
Judge Costello's AI section simply restates amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) — the post-AOSC26-12 statewide standard — a compliance model, not a local mandate: signers certify cited authorities exist and are accurately cited, with the rule's own sanctions.
The strongest in-the-wild confirmation of the 2026 statewide AI rule: Judge Bantner's page expressly states his prior AI requirements are REMOVED because of the May 28, 2026 amendment of Rule 2.515 — signing a filing now itself certifies the authorities exist and are accurately cited.