Loading…
3 verbatim mandatory provisions from S-2014-022.
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • Weekly S25 (January 16, 2014), the Florida Supreme Court adopted Rule 12.003 which requires that all related family cases must be handled before one judge ''unless impractical." Although the implementation of a "one family, one judge" approach may present challenges, we now implement the "one family, one judge" concept in accordance with the most recent decision of the Florida Supreme Court. • Notice of Related Cases Form In accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.545( d), petitioners in all Unified Family Court Divisions, except the Domestic Relations I Family Law Divisions, must complete and file a Notice of Related Cases form in conformity with Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.900(h) if any related cases are pending and known or reasonably ascertainable. • In accordance with Rule 2.545(d)(4), the petitioner must file the Notice in each of the related cases that are currently open and pending with the court.
Weekly S25 (January 16, 2014), the Florida Supreme Court adopted Rule 12.003 which requires that all related family cases must be handled before one judge ''unless impractical." Although the implementation of a "one family, one judge" approach may present challenges, we now implement the "one family, one judge" concept in accordance with the most recent decision of the Florida Supreme Court.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 98a327758a4524e7fbb98ad438e720c43672deef2accb3d2e3f0b4882cfb8909 (232204 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
The 17th Circuit's circuit-wide AI disclosure/certification mandate (Jan 2026, twice amended) was VACATED in its entirety effective June 15, 2026 by Chief Judge Phillips's AO 2026-19-Gen, expressly citing the statewide framework (AOSC26-12; Rule 2.515(d)(2), SC2026-0673). Several division procedure pages still cite the vacated order.
Every circuit-civil case reviewed within 120 days of commencement and assigned a track (complex, streamlined, or general); case management orders required; firm continuance policy; sanctions for missed deadlines. Rescinds AO 21-09.
Circuit-civil hearing-availability standards: motion calendars ~2 weeks from request; 15-30 min special sets within 45-60 days; longer special sets scale.