Loading…
3 verbatim mandatory provisions from S-2014-022.
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
• Weekly S25 (January 16, 2014), the Florida Supreme Court adopted Rule 12.003 which requires that all related family cases must be handled before one judge "unless impractical." Although the implementation of a "one family, one judge" approach may present challenges, we now implement the "one family, one judge" concept in accordance with the most recent decision of the Florida Supreme Court. • Notice of Related Cases Form In accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.545( d), petitioners in all Unified Family Court Divisions, except the Domestic Relations I Family Law Divisions, must complete and file a Notice of Related Cases form in conformity with Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.900(h) if any related cases are pending and known or reasonably ascertainable. • In accordance with Rule 2.545(d)(4), the petitioner must file the Notice in each of the related cases that are currently open and pending with the court.
Weekly S25 (January 16, 2014), the Florida Supreme Court adopted Rule 12.003 which requires that all related family cases must be handled before one judge ''unless impractical." Although the implementation of a "one family, one judge" approach may present challenges, we now implement the "one family, one judge" concept in accordance with the most recent decision of the Florida Supreme Court.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 98a327758a4524e7fbb98ad438e720c43672deef2accb3d2e3f0b4882cfb8909 (232204 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. [' AUDIT 2026-08-26: double-apostrophes adjudicated SOURCE-FAITHFUL - the custody text transcribes the scanned order's own typewriter quote marks / OCR of quote glyphs (the Galveston p6/p7 precedent). KEEP; never blind-fix.] Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.