Loading…
4 verbatim mandatory provisions from S-2015-020.
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • Hardship Waiver of Delayed Effective Date In cases in which the Clerk of the Circuit Court (clerk) issues a marriage license, the clerk may grant a waiver of the delayed effective date requirement upon a showing that the delay would cause a significant and substantial financial or personal hardship upon the person(s) seeking the waiver. In all cases in which the clerk is unable to grant a waiver and the marriage license applicant asserts a hardship, the clerk will forward the application to a county court judge who may grant a waiver of the delayed effective date requirement upon a showing of good cause.
Hardship Waiver of Delayed Effective Date In cases in which the Clerk of the Circuit Court (clerk) issues a marriage license, the clerk may grant a waiver of the delayed effective date requirement upon a showing that the delay would cause a significant and substantial financial or personal hardship upon the person(s) seeking the waiver. In all cases in which the clerk is unable to grant a waiver and the marriage license applicant asserts a hardship, the clerk will forward the application to a county court judge who may grant a waiver of the delayed effective date requirement upon a showing of good cause.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 442ccf7ce469f673cb1be3ab8a79b70d43164b59c810a0bbd845c8cc343c8024 (488940 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. 2 further paragraph(s) were left out because their OCR is too corrupt to quote.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.