Thirteenth Cir. — S-2026-025

High confidence· verified July 24, 2026Special Set HearingsThirteenth Judicial Circuit, S-2026-025 — harvested live and sha256-hashed 2026-07-24

Summary

12 verbatim mandatory provisions from S-2026-025.

Applies to

Thirteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Requirement

Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • Disputes involving custody, visitation and property will not be filed within the Title IV-D case but instead must be filed as a separate action. • If the hearing officer assigned to CSEHO Division 1 serves a Notice of Recusal, the case is automatically reassigned to and must be rescheduled with CSEHO Division 2. • If the hearing officer assigned to CSEHO Division 2 serves a Notice of Recusal, the case is automatically reassigned to and must be rescheduled with CSEHO Page 3 of 7 - Administrative Order S-2026-025 (Child Support Enforcement Hearing Officers Handling Title IV-D Matters) -- 3 of 7 -- Division 3. • If the hearing officer assigned to CSEHO Division 3 serves a Notice of Recusal, the case is automatically reassigned to and must be rescheduled with CSEHO Division 4. • If the hearing officer assigned to CSEHO Division 4 serves a Notice of Recusal, the case is automatically reassigned to and must be rescheduled with CSEHO Division 5. • If the hearing officer assigned to CSEHO Division 5 serves a Notice ofRecusal, the case is automatically reassigned to and must be rescheduled with CSEHO Division 6. • If the hearing officer assigned to CSEHO Division 6 serves a Notice ofRecusal, the case is automatically reassigned to and must be rescheduled with CSEHO Division 1. • Judicial Determination of Motion 's Legal Sufficiency If a party files with the clerk and serves on the presiding hearing officer a motion to disqualify, the hearing officer must immediately arrange for the motion to be brought to the attention of the judge assigned to Title IV-D Child Support Enforcement Division "Y" who will rule on the motion. • Recognizing the need for expediency, if the court is attending to other judicial matters the court must recess as soon as is practicable and immediately review the hearing officer' s recommended order. • If the court detennines that a hearing before the court is necessary, the matter will be scheduled on an emergency basis and must be heard immediately. 13. • Instanter Proceedings In all instanter hearings in which a respondent in custody has been brought before the heaiing officer for a dete1mination of their current ability to pay a previously ordered purge amount, the hearing officer shall promptly prepare a recommended order that will be reviewed by the judge assigned to Title IV-D Child Support Enforcement Division "Y." If the judge assigned to Title IV-D Child Support Enforcement Division "Y" is unavailable, the contempt matter must be reviewed and disposed of by the family law judge that is assigned to the division in which the case is pending. • If such judge is absent from the comihouse, the contempt matter shall be reviewed by the family law judge present in the courthouse whose division next follows in alphabetical sequence the division in which the case is pending.

Source of truth

Disputes involving custody, visitation and property will not be filed within the Title IV-D case but instead must be filed as a separate action.

Official source: 13th Cir. — Hearing Officers directory
Source health: Healthy · checked July 24, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: July 24, 2026benchpath-live-harvest-2026-07-24

Reviewer note: Document sha256: 93c41d7251ccedcf0e73f0d532c0ca4104f62f259d4433693d62cb0a1f14bf27 (3288576 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.