Loading…
2 verbatim mandatory provisions from S-2026-031.
Thirteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • Cost-of-Supervision Fee In accordance with Florida Statutes section 948.09(1 )(b), all persons placed on misdemeanor probation or a diversionary program on May 13 , 2026, or later, under the supervision of HCSO, will pay a monthly cost-of-supervision fee of $85 per month to HCSO. • Collection and Deposit of Cost-of-Supervision Fees & Collection and Disbursement of Clerk Fees, Restitution, Court Costs, Fines, Surcharges, and Indigent Status Application Fees The Clerk will collect cost-of-supervision fees and deposit them into a specified account in accordance with the Interlocal Agreement. HCSO will provide a monthly invoice to Hillsborough County no later than the tenth day of each month. The Clerk will also collect and disburse payments of Clerk fees, restitution, court costs, fines, surcharges, and any indigent status application fees from misdemeanor probationers. The Clerk must maintain an accurate accounting of all monies collected, deposited, and disbursed. Unless restitution is ordered to be paid to a victim under Florida Statutes section 948.09, the Clerk will assign the first $50 of any fees or costs paid by an indigent misdemeanor probationer as payment of the application fee in accordance with Florida Statutes section 27.52(1)(c). ENTERED on May 13th, 2026. Christopher C. Sabella, Chief Judge
Cost-of-Supervision Fee In accordance with Florida Statutes section 948.09(1 )(b), all persons placed on misdemeanor probation or a diversionary program on May 13 , 2026, or later, under the supervision of HCSO, will pay a monthly cost-of-supervision fee of $85 per month to HCSO.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: aafed68fbfdfff6a0071052d085c1b3897675f4a2a8e45bf3512aa73bbe5e2eb (333244 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. 1 further paragraph(s) were left out because their OCR is too corrupt to quote. Text recomposed 2026-09-08 (Phase 3b): OCR/extractor artifacts corrected verbatim against the official print; wording unchanged.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.