Broward Division 60/SA (ALLISON GILMAN) — Discovery

Source of truth

SUBMISSION OF ORDERS AND JUDGMENTS PROCEDURE FOR AGREED ORDERS/COMPEL ORDERS/ORDERS INVOKING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judge Gilman participates in the e-orders program. This means that if you are submitting any AGREED ORDER, EX-PARTE ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY, ORDER INVOKING THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, etc., and all parties are represented by attorneys, you MUST submit these through the online e-order system. Please follow this link to determine how this is done: http://www.17th.flcourts.org/index.php/self-help/eorders. Written Proposed Orders must be submitted directly to Chambers with copies to conform and return stamped envelopes for all parties. ANY HARD COPIES OF ORDERS DROPPED OFF OR MAILED TO THE COURT WILL NOT BE ENTERED IF THEY ARE ONE OF THESE TYPES OF ORDERS. PARTIES MAY NOT SUBMIT “AGREED” ORDERS ATTEMPTING TO CONTINUE COURT-ORDERED HEARINGS. If any party in the case is no

Official source

17th Circuit — Court site corpus (AO archive, local rules, judiciary)

Source health

Healthy · checked October 24, 2026

Effective date

—

Last verified

September 9, 2026benchpath-reverify-2026-09-08 (live text containment) | prior: benchpath-completeness-2026-07-24

Reviewer note: Document sha256: c4589b5b39b51667b884d339e96a3c71e3028437ec16f3697c7c3c4f099c943d. Corpus topic: DISCOVERY. Published during the completeness pass — the audit found 2,753 verbatim requirements against 123 published rules. GOOGLE DOCS VEIN: 102 of the Seventeenth Circuit's 106 division procedure documents are published as Google Docs (docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-...), not as PDFs on the court's own host. Two consecutive fetches of the same Google Doc URL return DIFFERENT bytes — Google injects per-request session config — so the document_sha256 recorded here pins one render, not a stable identity, and content-hash change detection does not work on this vein. Re-verified live 2026-07-24 by text presence instead: six sampled documents still carried 100%, 100%, 100%, 91%, 100% and 100% of their published requirements. Verbatim from the published divisional procedures, captured 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]