2 verbatim mandatory provisions from 01-06-s-amd.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • All cases initiated by the filing by the State Attorney of a Petition for Involuntary Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators pursuant to Section 394.14, Florida Statutes, shall be filed in the civil division of this court, given a civil case number, and assigned to a judge in the criminal division of this court pursuant to the provisions of Administrative Order No. • All cases presently pending pursuant to Section 394.14, Florida Statutes, that have not been assigned to the civil division shall be reassigned to the civil division, given civil division numbers by the clerk of this court, and assigned to the criminal division judge to whom they are currently assigned.
All cases initiated by the filing by the State Attorney of a Petition for Involuntary Civil Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators pursuant to Section 394.14, Florida Statutes, shall be filed in the civil division of this court, given a civil case number, and assigned to a judge in the criminal division of this court pursuant to the provisions of Administrative Order No.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: c51099ffa3887090953d7743cfc95503fbc3789217ceb06e4db3ad5d1b2fa438 (87100 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
Judge Costello's AI section simply restates amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) — the post-AOSC26-12 statewide standard — a compliance model, not a local mandate: signers certify cited authorities exist and are accurately cited, with the rule's own sanctions.
The strongest in-the-wild confirmation of the 2026 statewide AI rule: Judge Bantner's page expressly states his prior AI requirements are REMOVED because of the May 28, 2026 amendment of Rule 2.515 — signing a filing now itself certifies the authorities exist and are accurately cited.