3952-01__2017-07.pdf: published requirements — St. Lucie County, FL · BenchPath

19th Cir. — 3952-01__2017-07.pdf: published requirements

High confidence· verified September 9, 2026Proposed Orders19th Jud. Cir., 3952-01__2017-07.pdf (pp. 2) — sha256-hashed 2026-07-24

Summary

2 verbatim requirements extracted from 3952-01__2017-07.pdf, across 2 topics.

Applies to

Nineteenth Judicial Circuit (Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, St. Lucie). Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Requirement

PROPOSED ORDERS • violence, or stalking for service by law enforcement or the Sheriff. When forwarding a certified copy of an injunction or other order for service, the Clerk also must provide a Return of Service/Certificate of Non-Service in substantially the same format as Exhibit “A” attached to this Administrative Order. HEARING TIME & ARGUMENT LIMITS • When effecting service of an injunction or other order, the law enforcement officer shall complete the Return of S ervice/Certificate of Non -Service. The officer shall promptly, or otherwise within 24 hours of service of process, call in and electronically transmit a copy of the Return of Service/Certificate of Non-Service to the Sheriff’s Office with jurisdiction over the residence of the petitioner. If attempts at service are unsuccessful, the law enforcement officer attempting service shall promptly call in and transmit the Return of Service/Certificate of Non- Service and include relevant facts to indicate the reason for non-service.

Source of truth

violence, or stalking for service by law enforcement or the Sheriff. When forwarding a certified copy of an injunction or other order for service, the Clerk also must provide a Return of Service/Certificate of Non-Service in substantially the same format as Exhibit “A” attached to this Administrative Order.

Official source: 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org)
Source health: Healthy · checked October 24, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: September 9, 2026benchpath-reverify-2026-09-08 (custody hash match) | prior: benchpath-completeness-2026-07-24

Reviewer note: Document sha256: 5e35ffde82d70d7921ec3c17e3a1b97952d5189dc0d42a682b65edef21af48b9. One rule per order rather than per topic, so an order's requirements stay together. Published during the completeness pass. Text layer cleaned 2026-09-08 (Phase 3g): 1 kerning-split word rejoined; wording untouched. Verbatim from the order, captured 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used anywhere in this chain. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]

Stalking Injunction

Change history

August 5, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 4, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 3, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 28, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 27, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 26, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 25, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.