4315-02__2023-03.pdf: published requirements — St. Lucie County, FL · BenchPath

19th Cir. — 4315-02__2023-03.pdf: published requirements

High confidence· verified September 9, 2026Special Set Hearings19th Jud. Cir., 4315-02__2023-03.pdf (pp. 1, 2) — sha256-hashed 2026-07-24

Summary

4 verbatim requirements extracted from 4315-02__2023-03.pdf, across 2 topics.

Applies to

Nineteenth Judicial Circuit (Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, St. Lucie). Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Requirement

HEARING TIME & ARGUMENT LIMITS • 1. General Magistrates within the circuit may be utilized for the purpose of hearing civil matters as agreed to by the parties or as referred by the assigned judge. • 2. As referrals to a General Magistrate require the consent of the parties, should a party not consent to the use of a General Magistrate the party must file a written objection to the referral with the clerk of court, the presiding judge, and the opposing party(ies) prior to the commencement of the hearing on the issue(s) referred. Failure to file an objection shall constitute consent to the referred issue(s) being heard by the General Magistrate. • 3. The General Magistrate shall not be referred nor shall the General Magistrate hear: a. Jury trials b. Bench trials c. Final Hearings EXHIBITS & EVIDENCE • 4. Should the parties desire the referral of a matter to the General Magistrate prior to referral by the Court, an Order of Referral to the Magistrate in substantial conformity with that attached hereto as Exhibit A shall be provided to the Court for review and signature.

Source of truth

1. General Magistrates within the circuit may be utilized for the purpose of hearing civil matters as agreed to by the parties or as referred by the assigned judge.

Official source: 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org)
Source health: Healthy · checked October 24, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: September 9, 2026benchpath-reverify-2026-09-08 (custody hash match) | prior: benchpath-completeness-2026-07-24

Reviewer note: Document sha256: c63d49557c725ab570f696a0f26c74f0ec300bfe15b9c8362688753f50e0f627. One rule per order rather than per topic, so an order's requirements stay together. Published during the completeness pass. Verbatim from the order, captured 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used anywhere in this chain. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]

Change history

August 5, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 4, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 3, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 28, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 27, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 26, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 25, 2026Monitor: content changed at 19th Circuit — Administrative Orders (circuit19.org). Review before republishing dependent rules.