Ninth Cir. — Judge Juna M. Pulayya: Judge preferences

High confidence· verified September 9, 2026Judge PreferencesNinth Judicial Circuit — captured and sha256-hashed 2026-07-24

Summary

2 verbatim requirements on judge preferences.

Applies to

Ninth Judicial Circuit — Judge Juna M. Pulayya only. Practices change without notice; the court's own published text controls. Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Source of truth

If an attorney for a party, or a pro se party, has used Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in the preparation of any complaint, answer, motion, brief, or other paper filed with the Court, and assigned to Judge Juna M. Pulayya, you MUST, in a clear and plain factual statement, disclose that AI has been used in any way in the filing, and CERTIFY that each citation to the law or the record in the paper, has been verified as accurate.

Official source: 9th Circuit — Division 44 procedures (Judge Luis F. Calderon)
Source health: Healthy · checked October 24, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: September 9, 2026benchpath-reverify-2026-09-08 (custody hash match) | prior: benchpath-completeness-2026-07-24

Provenance record

Source sha256: . Corpus categories: ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE, PROPOSED_ORDERS. Quote status as recorded by the researcher: VERBATIM. Published during the 2026-07-24 completeness pass. Verbatim from the published source, captured 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]

Criminal Traffic Criminal — Felony DUI / BUI Criminal — Misdemeanor Bond & Pretrial Release Domestic Violence Battery Traffic (Civil Infractions)Post-Conviction (Rule 3.850)Sealing & Expunction Violation of Probation

Change history

August 8, 2026Monitor could not safely verify the registered source.
July 9, 2026Monitor: content changed at 9th Circuit — Division 44 procedures (Judge Luis F. Calderon). Review before republishing dependent rules.