Local Criminal Rule 49.1 — Personal Privacy Protection (formerly Criminal L.R. 1.3) (amended January 1, 2025)
A published court requirement that applies in New York. Category: Local Rules. Effective January 1, 2026. Verified against the official source (N.D.N.Y. — Local Rules (U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York)) on November 3, 2026.
Summary
Local Criminal Rule 49.1 — Personal Privacy Protection (formerly Criminal L.R. 1.3) (amended January 1, 2025): the court's own rule, verbatim from the Local Rules of Practice, United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, effective January 1, 2026 (official PDF, sha-custodied). Court-level requirement: applies in every case before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York as its section states (Section XI, Criminal Procedure), alongside the federal rules and any judge-specific procedures.
Requirement
Parties shall refrain from including, or shall redact where inclusion is necessary, the following personal identifiers from all filings with the Court, including exhibits thereto, whether filed electronically or in paper form, unless the Court orders otherwise. (a) Personal Identifiers 1. Social security/Taxpayer-identification numbers. If an individual’s social security number or a taxpayer-identification number must be included in a document, use only the last four digits of that number. 2. Names of minor children. If the involvement of a minor child must be mentioned, use a pseudonym. 3. Dates of birth. If an individual’s date of birth must be included in a document, use only the year. 4. Financial account numbers. If financial account numbers are relevant, use only the last four digits of those numbers. 5. Home Addresses. If a home address must be used, use only the City and State. However, a Pro Se defendant must include their complete mailing address in the signature block on all documents filed with the Court pursuant to L.R. 10.1(c)(2) which shall also appear on the face of the docket. 6. Names of Sexual Assault Victims. If the victim of a sexual assault must be referenced, redact the name to “Victim 1”, “Victim 2,” etc. In addition, caution shall be exercised when filing documents that contain the following: 1. personal identifying number, such as a driver’s license number; 2. medical records, treatment and diagnosis; 3. employment history; 4. individual financial information; and 5. proprietary or trade secret information. For exceptions, see Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1. (b) In compliance with the E-Government Act of 2002, a party wishing to file a document containing the personal data identifiers listed above may: 1. file an unredacted version of the document under seal in compliance with Criminal Local Rule 49.2, or 2. file a reference list under seal in compliance with Criminal Local Rule 49.2. The reference list shall contain the complete personal data identifier(s) and the redacted identifier(s) used in its (their) place in the filing. The Court will construe all references in the case to the redacted identifiers included in the reference list to refer to the corresponding complete personal data identifier. The party must file the reference list under seal and may amend it as of right. A person waives the protection afforded by Fed.R.Crim.P. 49.1(a) as to the person’s own information by filing it without redaction and not under seal. See Fed.R.Crim.P. Rule 49.1(h). The Court strongly urges counsel to discuss this issue with all their clients so that they can make an informed decision about the inclusion of certain information. The responsibility for redacting these personal identifiers rests solely with counsel and the parties. The Clerk will not review each filing for compliance with this Rule. The Court cautions counsel and the parties that failure to redact these personal identifiers may subject them to the Court's full disciplinary power. (d) Protective Orders. See Fed.R.Crim.P. Rule 49.1(e).
Source of truth
Parties shall refrain from including, or shall redact where inclusion is necessary, the following personal identifiers from all filings with the Court, including exhibits thereto, whether filed electronically or in paper form, unless the Court orders otherwise. (a) Personal Ident
- Source health
- Healthy · checked November 14, 2026
- Effective date
- January 1, 2026
- Last verified
- November 3, 2026benchpath-nyfed-rules-2026-11-03
Related rules
2d Cir. Local Rule 25.2 — Submission of PDF Documents
2d Cir. Local Rule 25.2 — Submission of PDF Documents: the court's own rule, verbatim from the rule's own page on the court's site (read 2026-11-03; the page sha-custodied). Court-level requirement: applies in every appeal and proceeding before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, alongside the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Duval County Local Rules Implementing S.B. 7 (Texas Fair Defense Act) — Order Amending Local Rules of the District/County Court of Duval County, amended July 11, 2022
Duval County's indigent-defense and magistration rules under the Texas Fair Defense Act (S.B. 7): who may be booked into the county jail and on what paper; arrest-case numbering; presentment to a magistrate within 48 hours (art. 15.16); the magistrate's warnings, counsel inquiry, interpreter duty, indigence determination and appointment of counsel within 24 hours of a request; the alternative appointment plan under art. 26.04(g)-(h) with annual applications, seven attorney categories (capital, first and second degree, third degree/state jail/misdemeanor, competency, appeals, post-conviction, extradition), CLE and experience standards, random rotation within each category, written acceptance within 48 hours, first contact by the end of the next working day, replacement and suspension of counsel, fee applications within five days of completing services and the compensation attachment ($500 pleas; $175/$150 hourly; $1,400 per jury-trial day; appellate caps); bail schedules by offense class with a personal bond office (fee $20 or 3%), pre-trial supervision and revocation hearings within two working days; arraignment settings and notice; repeal of conflicting rules.
Starr County Local Rules for the Judicial District Courts (229th and 381st District Courts, applying in part to the County Court at Law; approved May 31, 2018; approved and recommended to the Supreme Court by the Fifth Region's Presiding Judge August 9, 2018)
The 23 local rules of the Starr County district courts: definitions and the election of the Local Administrative District Judge (last Friday in January of odd years; two-year term from February 1); random, equal assignment of district cases and the County Court at Law's share (family cases, civil cases pleading $100,000 or less, misdemeanors); the case-numbering format effective January 1, 2019 (year, CV/CR/CRS/FM/TAX, five digits; CRS for the 229th, CR for the 381st); notice of visiting-judge assignments; electronically transmitted pleadings (cover sheet, seven-day fee window, returns of service and bonds on paper, one-hour clerk handling of child-protection filings); transfer of related civil cases to the earlier court and SAPCR transfer to the divorce court; pre-trial settings through the Court Coordinator; District Clerk duties and I-Docket access; severance; temporary, emergency and ex parte orders; uncontested matters first; assignment of related prosecutions and superseding-indictment numbering (S1, S2); the protocol for trial priority (jury over non-jury, criminal over civil, jailed defendants first, oldest case first, special settings by written reasons, duties of counsel with conflicting settings); court staff; jury impaneling; the ad litem/guardian ad litem/amicus appointment rotation, duties, vouchers within thirty days and objections within thirty days; and courtroom decorum and attire.
Local Rules for the Jim Wells County Court at Law — effective January 1, 2023
The Jim Wells County Court at Law's rules: ad litem, guardian ad litem and amicus appointment lists, qualifications, duties, flat-fee ($275) and hourly ($75–$125) compensation, voucher deadlines and fee objections; rules of administration with the 79th District Court (family-code cases and civil cases between $500 and $250,000 assigned to the County Court at Law); remote non-jury proceedings by Zoom with e-mailed setting requests, Dropbox exhibits and YouTube broadcast; settings, proposed orders, exhibits and courtroom decorum.