N.D.N.Y. General Order #10 — Adopting the U.S. Probation Office's Computer and Internet Monitoring Program
A published court requirement that applies in New York. Category: Standing Orders. Verified against the official source (N.D.N.Y. — General Orders (U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York)) on November 7, 2026.
Summary
General Order #10 — Adopting the U.S. Probation Office's Computer and Internet Monitoring Program: the court's own order as its General Orders page lists it, verbatim from the official PDF (sha-custodied), the whole document. Court-level requirement: governs practice in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York alongside the Local Rules, the federal rules and any judge-specific procedures.
Requirement
U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF N.Y. FILED May 23, 2016 LAWRENCE K. BAERMAN, CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTING THE U.S. PROBATION OFFICE’S COMPUTER AND INTERNET MONITORING PROGRAM GENERAL ORDER #10 A special condition of supervision is frequently used in the Northern District of New York which calls for a defendant or offender to not use or possess any computer, data storage device or any internet capable device unless the defendant or offender participates in the Computer and Internet Monitoring Program. The U.S. Probation Office oversees said program and has provided the Board of Judges with the Program Conditions/Rules, a Computer and Internet Data Form, a Computer and Internet Data Modification Form, and a Third Party Internet Notification Form which each defendant or offender subject to the aforementioned condition must execute. The Board of Judges has reviewed the program rules and related forms and finds the program meets the ends of justice sought when imposing said condition. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the U.S. Probation Office shall continue to oversee the Computer and Internet Monitoring Program as outlined in the current rules and related forms as approved by the Board of Judges for the Northern District of New York. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 23 rd day of May 2016
Source of truth
U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF N.Y. FILED May 23, 2016 LAWRENCE K. BAERMAN, CLERK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTING THE U.S. PROBATION OFFICE’S COMPUTER AND INTERNET MONITORING PROGRAM GENERAL ORDER #10 A special condition o
- Source health
- Healthy · checked November 14, 2026
- Effective date
- —
- Last verified
- November 7, 2026benchpath-nyfed-orders-2026-11-07
Related rules
Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence - 109th Judicial District Court, Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties (signed December 6, 2024)
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence - 109th Judicial District Court, Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties (signed December 6, 2024)
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Order Adopting the Implementation of Pre-Trial Supervision (381st and 229th District Courts and County Court at Law of Starr County; effective November 1, 2025)
A one-page joint order of the 381st and 229th District Courts and the County Court at Law of Starr County: a person charged with a felony, a statutorily mandated DWI offense or any assaultive offense involving family or domestic violence under Family Code section 71.004 who is released from jail on a personal bond or any other bond must submit to pre-trial supervision through the Starr County Community Supervision and Corrections Department; the magistrate or the court may dismiss a case on the State's motion; effective November 1, 2025.
105th District Court (Kleberg County) Standing Order No. MISC233001 — authority to set bail for a defendant charged with a subsequent felony while on bail (Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 17.027) — June 2, 2023
Judge Jack W. Pulcher's standing order under art. 17.027 (S.B. 6, 87th Leg. 2nd C.S.): the district judge reserves bail authority in indicted cases; the appointed Title 54A associate judge and jail magistrates designated by that judge may set bail in pending unindicted cases; other magistrates transfer such defendants to the Kleberg County Sheriff within 12 hours; for out-of-county prior felonies any Kleberg magistrate acts within 24 hours after reviewing the criminal history and Public Safety Report and notifies the originating court.