Skip to main content

N.D.N.Y. General Order #64 — Vacatur of Standard Condition of Supervision Pertaining to Third Party Risk

High confidence· verified November 7, 2026Standing Orders

A published court requirement that applies in New York. Category: Standing Orders. Verified against the official source (N.D.N.Y. — General Orders (U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York)) on November 7, 2026.

Summary

General Order #64 — Vacatur of Standard Condition of Supervision Pertaining to Third Party Risk: the court's own order as its General Orders page lists it, verbatim from the official PDF (sha-custodied), the whole document. Court-level requirement: governs practice in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York alongside the Local Rules, the federal rules and any judge-specific procedures.

Requirement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GENERAL ORDER #64 Vacatur of Standard Condition of Supervision Pertaining to Third Party Risk So Ordered: February 15, 2022 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF N.Y. FILED February 15, 2022 JOHN M. DOMURAD CLERK WHEREAS, prior to January 25, 2019, Condition #12 of the Standard Conditions of Probation and Supervised Release, as reflected in this Court's Judgment and Consent Form ("Old Standard Condition #12), read as follows: If the probation officer determines that you pose a risk to another person (including an organization), the probation officer may require you to notify the person about the risk and you must comply with that instruction. The probation officer may contact the person and confirm that you have notified the person about the risk; and WHEREAS, on January 25, 2019, in United States v. Boles, 914 F.3d 95, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that Old Standard Condition #12 impermissibly delegated too much authority to a probation officer; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Court that all persons upon whom Old Standard Condition #12 was imposed should be relieved of that condition immediately and without the need for motion practice or other judicial proceedings; WHEREAS, in light of Boles, this court has subsequently created New Standard Condition #12, which reads as follows: If the court determines in consultation with your probation officer that, based on your criminal record, personal history and characteristics, and the nature and circumstances of your offense, you pose a risk of committing further crimes against another person (including an organization), the probation officer may require you to notify the person about the risk and you must comply with that instruction. The probation officer may contact the person and confirm that you have notified the person about the risk. WHEREAS, in the interest of the orderly administration of justice, it is hereby ORDERED, that any and all judgments of conviction entered by this court pursuant to which Old Standard Condition #12 was imposed as a Standard Condition of Probation or Supervised Release are hereby modified by vacating and eliminating therefrom Old Standard Condition #12, and any defendant who was sentenced subject to said condition is immediately and permanently relieved from said condition; and it is further ORDERED, that any and all judgements of conviction entered by this court as to any defendant to which Old Standard Condition #12 was imposed as a Standard Condition of Probation or Supervised Release shall now be subject to and must comply with the New Standard Condition #12 adopted by this court. By ballot vote, this General Order was approved by the Board of Judges and will become effective immediately. So ORDERED this 15th day of February 2022 At Syracuse, New York

Source of truth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GENERAL ORDER #64 Vacatur of Standard Condition of Supervision Pertaining to Third Party Risk So Ordered: February 15, 2022 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF N.Y. FILED February 15, 2022 JOHN M. DOMURAD CLERK WHEREAS, p
Source health
Healthy · checked November 14, 2026
Effective date
—
Last verified
November 7, 2026benchpath-nyfed-orders-2026-11-07

Related rules

Standing OrdersCrane County

Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence - 109th Judicial District Court, Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties (signed December 6, 2024)

Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.

High confidence· verified September 24, 2026Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence - 109th Judicial District Court, Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties (signed December 6, 2024); posted on Crane County's website (https://www.co.crane.tx.us/upload/page/0576/StandingOrderArtificialIntelligence.pdf, linked from https://www.co.crane.tx.us/page/crane.District.Clerk), fetched 2026-09-24.
Standing OrdersWinkler County

Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence - 109th Judicial District Court, Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties (signed December 6, 2024)

Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.

High confidence· verified September 24, 2026Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence - 109th Judicial District Court, Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties (signed December 6, 2024); posted on Crane County's website (https://www.co.crane.tx.us/upload/page/0576/StandingOrderArtificialIntelligence.pdf, linked from https://www.co.crane.tx.us/page/crane.District.Clerk), fetched 2026-09-24.
Standing OrdersStarr County

Order Adopting the Implementation of Pre-Trial Supervision (381st and 229th District Courts and County Court at Law of Starr County; effective November 1, 2025)

A one-page joint order of the 381st and 229th District Courts and the County Court at Law of Starr County: a person charged with a felony, a statutorily mandated DWI offense or any assaultive offense involving family or domestic violence under Family Code section 71.004 who is released from jail on a personal bond or any other bond must submit to pre-trial supervision through the Starr County Community Supervision and Corrections Department; the magistrate or the court may dismiss a case on the State's motion; effective November 1, 2025.

High confidence· verified September 10, 2026Order Adopting the Implementation of Pre-Trial Supervision, In the 381st District Court, the 229th District Court and in the Starr County Court at Law of Starr County, Texas, Rules 1-3, effective November 1, 2025, approved October 28, 2025 and signed by Jose Luis Garza (Administrative Judge, 381st District Court), Baldemar Garza (229th District Judge) and Orlando Rodriguez (County Court at Law); filed with the Starr County District Clerk October 30, 2025; TOPICs registration 2658 (Starr County, registered 11/04/2025).
Standing OrdersKleberg County · Judge Jack William Pulcher

105th District Court (Kleberg County) Standing Order No. MISC233001 — authority to set bail for a defendant charged with a subsequent felony while on bail (Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 17.027) — June 2, 2023

Judge Jack W. Pulcher's standing order under art. 17.027 (S.B. 6, 87th Leg. 2nd C.S.): the district judge reserves bail authority in indicted cases; the appointed Title 54A associate judge and jail magistrates designated by that judge may set bail in pending unindicted cases; other magistrates transfer such defendants to the Kleberg County Sheriff within 12 hours; for out-of-county prior felonies any Kleberg magistrate acts within 24 hours after reviewing the criminal history and Public Safety Report and notifies the originating court.

High confidence· verified September 10, 2026Standing Order No. MISC233001 — Standing Order of the 105th District Court of Kleberg County Establishing Authority to Set Bail as to a Defendant Charged with Committing a Subsequent Felony Offense While on Bail (Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 17.027), ordered and issued June 2, 2023, Hon. Jack W Pulcher, Judge Presiding; TOPICs registration 1410 (Kleberg County, Standing Orders, County; District, 06/05/2023).