Local Civil Rule 83.10 (S.D.N.Y. and E.D.N.Y.) — Plan for Certain § 1983 Cases Against Police Department Employees (Southern District Only)
A published court requirement that applies in New York. Category: Local Rules. Effective January 2, 2026. Verified against the official source (S.D.N.Y. — Local Rules (U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York)) on November 2, 2026.
Summary
Local Civil Rule 83.10 (S.D.N.Y. and E.D.N.Y.) — Plan for Certain § 1983 Cases Against Police Department Employees (Southern District Only): the court's own rule, verbatim from Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York (Effective January 2, 2026), official PDF, sha-custodied. Court-level requirement: applies in every civil, criminal, admiralty, patent and Social Security case before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York as its series states, alongside the federal rules and any judge-specific procedures; adopted jointly with the Eastern District of New York and carded here as the Southern District applies them.
Requirement
Unless ordered otherwise, in any civil case filed by a represented plaintiff alleging the use of excessive force, false arrest, or malicious prosecution by an employee of a police department in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the procedures set forth below will apply, except that the procedures and Protective Order identified in paragraphs (c) through (l) will not apply to class actions, actions brought by six or more plaintiffs, complaints requesting systemic equitable reform, or actions requesting immediate injunctive relief. (a) Service of Releases with Complaint (1) At the time that plaintiff serves the complaint, plaintiff must serve on defendant: (i) a release for sealed arrest records for the arrest that is the subject of the complaint and for a list of all prior arrests. A separate release is required for each municipality identified in the complaint. In the case of class actions, plaintiff must serve such releases for the named putative class representatives; and (ii) if plaintiff seeks compensation for any physical or mental injury caused by the conduct alleged in the complaint other than “garden variety” emotional distress, a medical release for all medical and psychological treatment records for those injuries. Where plaintiff has a preexisting physical or mental condition that reasonably appears to be related to the injury for which compensation is sought, plaintiff must at that same time serve medical releases on defendant for all records of treatment for the preexisting condition(s). Plaintiff should expect that a failure to serve the applicable medical release(s) will constitute a waiver of plaintiff’s claims for compensation for that physical or mental injury. (b) Failure to Serve Releases If plaintiff fails to serve a release in accordance with paragraph (a)(1)(i) on defendant with the complaint, defendant must promptly send a letter to plaintiff's counsel requesting the release and attaching a copy of this Rule. (c) Time to Answer If the release required by paragraph (a)(1)(i) is served on defendant at the time the complaint is first served, defendant will have 80 days from the date of such service to answer the complaint. Any subsequently served defendant will have the greater of (i) 60 days, or (ii) the date by which the first-served defendant must answer, to answer the complaint. If such release is served on a defendant after the complaint is first served, each defendant will have the greater of (i) 60 days from the date the release is served on the City, or (ii) 60 days after that defendant is served, to answer the complaint. If any defendant moves to dismiss the entire complaint rather than filing an answer, the deadlines in this rule will be stayed unless the court orders otherwise. (d) Rule 26(f) Conference, Initial Disclosures, and Applying for Exemption from the Rule (1) Within 14 days after the first defendant files an answer, the parties must confer in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). The parties must also discuss whether to request that the court exempt the case from Local Civil Rule 83.10. Any such application by a party must be submitted to the presiding judge no later than 21 days after the first defendant files an answer. (2) Within 21 days after the first defendant files an answer, the parties must exchange their initial disclosures. (e) Limited Discovery Within 28 days after the first defendant files an answer, the parties must complete production of the following discovery. (1) Defendant must serve on plaintiff: (A) Subject to any applicable privileges, any of the following items, if available, that were not part of the defendant’s initial disclosures: (i) Complaint reports; (ii) Use of Force reports; (iii) Defendant officer’s notes, memobook entries, or daily activity reports; (iv) 911 reports, including any recordings; (v) Radio run reports (audio and written); (vi) Any video or photographs of the incident; (vii) Injury reports; (viii) Property vouchers; (ix) Evidence vouchers; (x) Arrest reports; (xi) Mugshots; (xii) Reports of medical treatment for plaintiff while in custody; (xiii) Desk Appearance Tickets (for arrests after January 2009) or other tickets; (xiv) Summonses; and (xv) Handwritten Online Booking System forms. (B) Any documents received from a district attorney’s office or a court regarding the incident that forms the basis of the complaint. (C) Any records or reports by an oversight agency or from an internal investigation regarding the incident that forms the basis of the complaint. If the incident or the conduct of defendants involved in the incident is the subject of an ongoing investigation by an oversight agency, internal police department investigation or disciplinary proceeding, criminal investigation, or outstanding indictment or information, discovery under this paragraph shall be suspended, and defendant will produce the investigative records 30 days after the investigation or proceeding has been terminated (whether by completion of the investigation without charges being brought or by disposition of the charges). This suspension will not apply to documents related to any investigation or proceeding that has concluded. (D) For each defendant, any records of complaints or incidents that are similar to the incident alleged in the complaint or that raise questions about the defendant’s credibility. If the complaint alleges that a defendant used excessive force, defendant will state whether that defendant has been or is subject to any corrective action related to use of force. (E) For each officer named as a defendant, a list identifying all prior section 1983 lawsuits filed against and served on the defendant. (F) Any records obtained by defendant as a result of the medical releases served in accordance with paragraph (a)(1)(ii). Medical records received after this date must be produced to plaintiff within seven days of receipt. (G) Transcripts or other information generated pursuant to hearings under N.Y. General Municipal Law § 50-h. (2) Plaintiff must serve on defendant: (A) Any documents identified in paragraphs (e)(1)(A) and (B). (B) Any medical records for which plaintiff has served on defendant a medical release in accordance with paragraph (a)(1)(ii). (C) Any video and photographs of the incident. (f) Amended Pleadings The complaint may be amended to name additional defendants without leave of the presiding judge within six weeks after the first defendant files an answer. The filing of the amended complaint will not affect any of the duties imposed by Local Civil Rule 83.10. (g) Settlement Demand and Offer Within six weeks after the first defendant files an answer, plaintiff must serve a written settlement demand. Defendant must respond in writing to plaintiff’s demand within 14 days thereafter. The parties must thereafter engage in settlement negotiations. (h) Letter to the Presiding Judge Within 10 weeks after the first defendant files an answer, the parties must file a letter with an update on the status of the case, including the following information: (1) Unless the presiding judge has already scheduled or held an initial pretrial conference, at least three dates on which the parties would be available for an initial pretrial conference; and (2) Unless the presiding judge has referred the case to the Mediation Program or to a magistrate judge for settlement purposes, whether the parties believe that they would benefit from such a referral. (i) Mediation or Settlement Conference Plaintiff must attend any mediation or settlement conference. Defendant’s representative at any mediation or settlement conference must have full authority to settle the case; if defendant requires additional approvals in order to settle, defendant must have arranged for telephone access to those persons during the mediation or settlement conference. If any defendant is insured, a fully authorized representative of that defendant’s insurance company must attend any mediation or settlement conference if the decision to settle or the amount of settlement must be approved by the insurance company. (j) Failure to Timely Comply with the Requirements of this Rule If any party fails to comply with any requirement under this rule, the other party must promptly write to the presiding judge indicating the nature of the failure and requesting relief. (k) Protective Order The Protective Order found on the court’s website will be deemed to have been issued in all cases governed by this rule. (l) Preservation Local Civil Rule 83.10 does not relieve any party of its obligation to preserve documents and to issue preservation instructions.
Source of truth
Unless ordered otherwise, in any civil case filed by a represented plaintiff alleging the use of excessive force, false arrest, or malicious prosecution by an employee of a police department in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the procedures set forth below will apply, except that
- Source health
- Healthy · checked November 14, 2026
- Effective date
- January 2, 2026
- Last verified
- November 2, 2026benchpath-nyfed-rules-2026-11-02
Change history
- November 13, 2026Monitor detected a source-content or hash-basis change. Review the archived bytes before republishing dependent material.
- November 6, 2026Monitor detected a source-content or hash-basis change. Review the archived bytes before republishing dependent material.
- November 5, 2026Monitor detected a source-content or hash-basis change. Review the archived bytes before republishing dependent material.
Related rules
2d Cir. Local Rule 25.2 — Submission of PDF Documents
2d Cir. Local Rule 25.2 — Submission of PDF Documents: the court's own rule, verbatim from the rule's own page on the court's site (read 2026-11-03; the page sha-custodied). Court-level requirement: applies in every appeal and proceeding before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, alongside the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Duval County Local Rules Implementing S.B. 7 (Texas Fair Defense Act) — Order Amending Local Rules of the District/County Court of Duval County, amended July 11, 2022
Duval County's indigent-defense and magistration rules under the Texas Fair Defense Act (S.B. 7): who may be booked into the county jail and on what paper; arrest-case numbering; presentment to a magistrate within 48 hours (art. 15.16); the magistrate's warnings, counsel inquiry, interpreter duty, indigence determination and appointment of counsel within 24 hours of a request; the alternative appointment plan under art. 26.04(g)-(h) with annual applications, seven attorney categories (capital, first and second degree, third degree/state jail/misdemeanor, competency, appeals, post-conviction, extradition), CLE and experience standards, random rotation within each category, written acceptance within 48 hours, first contact by the end of the next working day, replacement and suspension of counsel, fee applications within five days of completing services and the compensation attachment ($500 pleas; $175/$150 hourly; $1,400 per jury-trial day; appellate caps); bail schedules by offense class with a personal bond office (fee $20 or 3%), pre-trial supervision and revocation hearings within two working days; arraignment settings and notice; repeal of conflicting rules.
Starr County Local Rules for the Judicial District Courts (229th and 381st District Courts, applying in part to the County Court at Law; approved May 31, 2018; approved and recommended to the Supreme Court by the Fifth Region's Presiding Judge August 9, 2018)
The 23 local rules of the Starr County district courts: definitions and the election of the Local Administrative District Judge (last Friday in January of odd years; two-year term from February 1); random, equal assignment of district cases and the County Court at Law's share (family cases, civil cases pleading $100,000 or less, misdemeanors); the case-numbering format effective January 1, 2019 (year, CV/CR/CRS/FM/TAX, five digits; CRS for the 229th, CR for the 381st); notice of visiting-judge assignments; electronically transmitted pleadings (cover sheet, seven-day fee window, returns of service and bonds on paper, one-hour clerk handling of child-protection filings); transfer of related civil cases to the earlier court and SAPCR transfer to the divorce court; pre-trial settings through the Court Coordinator; District Clerk duties and I-Docket access; severance; temporary, emergency and ex parte orders; uncontested matters first; assignment of related prosecutions and superseding-indictment numbering (S1, S2); the protocol for trial priority (jury over non-jury, criminal over civil, jailed defendants first, oldest case first, special settings by written reasons, duties of counsel with conflicting settings); court staff; jury impaneling; the ad litem/guardian ad litem/amicus appointment rotation, duties, vouchers within thirty days and objections within thirty days; and courtroom decorum and attire.
Local Rules for the Jim Wells County Court at Law — effective January 1, 2023
The Jim Wells County Court at Law's rules: ad litem, guardian ad litem and amicus appointment lists, qualifications, duties, flat-fee ($275) and hourly ($75–$125) compensation, voucher deadlines and fee objections; rules of administration with the 79th District Court (family-code cases and civil cases between $500 and $250,000 assigned to the County Court at Law); remote non-jury proceedings by Zoom with e-mailed setting requests, Dropbox exhibits and YouTube broadcast; settings, proposed orders, exhibits and courtroom decorum.