Loc. R. Civ. P. 16 — Alternative Dispute Resolution and Pretrial Conferences
A published court requirement that applies in New York. Category: Local Rules. Effective January 15, 2026. Verified against the official source (W.D.N.Y. — Rules: Individual, Local & Federal (U.S. District Court, Western District of New York)) on November 3, 2026.
Summary
Loc. R. Civ. P. 16 — Alternative Dispute Resolution and Pretrial Conferences: the court's own rule, verbatim from the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, United States District Court for the Western District of New York, effective January 15, 2026 (official PDF, sha-custodied). Court-level requirement: applies in every civil case before the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, alongside the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the rules are numbered to conform to them) and any judge-specific procedures.
Requirement
(a) Alternative Dispute Resolution. This Court has adopted an Alternative Dispute Resolution Plan (“ADR”), as implemented by Standing Order, under which certain civil cases are referred automatically to ADR upon filing. A copy of the Plan is available on the Court’s website, http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov. The Clerk of Court will provide notice to the parties when a case is automatically referred. Any civil case that is not automatically referred may be referred to ADR by order of the presiding Judge, in their discretion. The ADR process is confidential. Litigants in cases not referred automatically to ADR must consider possible agreement to the use of an ADR process. (b) Initial Pretrial Conference (1) Purpose. The Court shall hold an initial pretrial conference in all cases except those exempted from initial disclosure requirements under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). The purpose of this conference is to establish a case management plan. (2) Party Conference. Prior to the initial pretrial conference, counsel for all parties and any pro se litigants shall confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and shall file with the Court a joint, written discovery plan consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). If they are unable to agree to a plan, each party shall file its own proposed plan. (A) Electronically Stored Information. The Court expects the parties to cooperatively reach agreement on how to preserve and conduct discovery of electronically stored information (“ESI”).1 Prior to the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, counsel should become knowledgeable about their clients’ information management systems and their operation, including how information is stored and retrieved. In addition, counsel should make a reasonable attempt to ascertain the contents of their client’s ESI, including backup, archival, and legacy data (outdated formats or media) and ESI that may not be reasonably accessible. In particular, prior to or at the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, the parties should confer regarding the following matters: (i) Preservation. Counsel should attempt to agree on steps the parties will take to segregate and preserve ESI in order to avoid accusations of spoliation. (ii) E-mail Information. Counsel should attempt to agree on the scope of e-mail discovery and e-mail search protocol. (iii) Back-up and Archival Data. Counsel should attempt to agree on whether responsive back-up and archival data exists, the extent to which back-up and archival data is reasonably accessible, and who will bear the cost of obtaining such data. (iv) Format and Media. Counsel should attempt to agree on the format and media to be used in the production of ESI, and whether production of some or all ESI in paper form is agreeable in lieu of production in electronic format. (v) Reasonably Accessible Information and Costs. Counsel should attempt to determine if any responsive ESI is not reasonably accessible, i.e., is accessible only by incurring undue burdens or costs. (B) Privileged or Trial Preparation Materials. Counsel also should attempt to reach agreement regarding what will happen in the event privileged or trial preparation materials are inadvertently disclosed. 1Except for the term “document,” which is defined at Loc. R. Civ. P. 26(d)(3)(B), the Court will rely on The Sedona Conference Glossary: E-Discovery & Digital Information Management (Second Edition), for definitions of terms related to discovery of ESI. (3) Content of the Initial Conference. In addition to all of the matters in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c)(2), counsel and unrepresented parties shall be prepared to discuss meaningfully the following: (A) if the case is referred automatically to ADR pursuant to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Plan, selection of a neutral, and timing for ADR; (B) if the case is not referred automatically to ADR, possible stipulation to the use of a confidential ADR process; (C) any problems currently known and reasonably anticipated to arise in connection with discovery of ESI; (D) proposed methods to limit and/or decrease the time and expense of discovery; (E) the use of experts during discovery and at trial; (F) the possibility of consent to the Magistrate Judge conducting all or part of the proceedings in a case provided, however, that unless there is unanimous consent among the parties, no party shall discuss its position with the Court; and (G) for cases in which class claims are alleged, (i) the timing of the filing of a motion for class certification; (ii) the appointment of interim class counsel; (iii) the timing and scope of discovery, including discovery of Electronically Stored Information, prior to resolution of the motion for class certification, pursuant to Loc. R. Civ. P. 23(c); and (iv) a schedule for briefing a motion for class certification. (4) Scheduling Order. After the initial pretrial conference, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), the Court shall issue an order providing: (A) deadlines for joinder of parties and amendment of pleadings; (B) deadlines for Alternative Dispute Resolution, if applicable; (C) if applicable, deadlines for the items described in Loc. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(3)(G); (D) a discovery cut-off date; (E) a deadline for filing dispositive motions; (F) deadlines for the disclosure of expert witnesses, if applicable; and (G) any other matter decided or agreed upon at the initial pretrial conference. A scheduling order cannot be modified except by Court order. (c) Settlement Conferences. (1) Applicable Cases. Unless a case will proceed to ADR, the Court retains the discretion whether to hold a judicial settlement conference. (2) Party Obligations. The plaintiff(s) shall provide the defendant(s) with a written settlement demand at least fourteen (14) days before the first settlement conference, and the defendant(s) shall respond to the demand in writing at least seven (7) days before the conference, so that the parties and their attorneys have a meaningful opportunity to consider and discuss the settlement proposals. In cases involving insurance coverage, defense counsel also shall consult with the insurance carrier prior to the conference regarding its position. Judges may, at their discretion, require a preconference, written submission from each party. (3) Attendance. At the settlement conference, the attorneys shall be present and shall be prepared to state their clients’ respective positions to the Court. Judges may, at their discretion, require the attendance of parties, party representatives, insurance carriers, and others whose attendance they believe may facilitate settlement, either in person or by telephone. (4) Further Settlement Conferences. If a settlement is not reached at the first conference, the Court may schedule additional settlement conferences from time to time, as appropriate. (d) Additional Pretrial Conferences. The Court may schedule additional pretrial conferences in its discretion, or at a party’s request. Counsel and pro se litigants shall be prepared to provide a status update on discovery, motion practice, and the prospects for settlement. (e) Final Pretrial Conference. (1) Timing and Content. A final pretrial conference shall be held at the direction of the Court within thirty (30) days of the trial date. Trial counsel shall be present at this conference and shall be prepared to discuss all aspects of the case and any matters which may narrow the issues and aid in its prompt disposition, including: (A) the possibility of settlement; (B) motions in limine; (C) the resolution of any legal or factual issues raised in the pre-trial statement of any party (see subsection 2); (D) stipulations (which shall be in writing); and (E) any other matters that counsel or the Court deems appropriate. (2) Pretrial Statement. No later than fourteen (14) days before the date of the final pretrial conference, or by such other date as may be set by Court order, counsel for each party shall file and serve a pretrial statement which includes the following: (A) a detailed statement of contested and uncontested facts, and of the party’s position regarding contested facts; (B) a detailed statement of the issues of law involved and any unusual questions relative to the admissibility of evidence, together with supporting authority; (C) proposed jury instructions and verdict form, if any, which shall also be provided to chambers in Word format; (D) the names and addresses of witnesses (other than rebuttal witnesses) expected to testify, together with a brief statement of their anticipated testimony; (E) a brief summary of the qualifications of all expert witnesses, and a concise statement of each expert’s expected opinion testimony and the material upon which that testimony is expected to be based; (F) a list of exhibits anticipated to be used at trial, except exhibits which may be used solely for impeachment or rebuttal; (G) a list of any deposition testimony to be offered in evidence; (H) an itemized statement of each element of special damages and other relief sought; and (I) such additional submissions as the Court directs. Counsel are encouraged to review the individual Rules of the assigned District Judge or Magistrate Judge for specific pretrial statement requirements. (3) Marking Exhibits. Prior to the final pre-trial conference, counsel shall meet to mark and list each exhibit contained in the pre-trial statements. At the conference, counsel shall produce a copy of each exhibit for examination by opposing counsel and for notice of any objection to its admission in evidence. (4) Post-Conference Order. Following the final pretrial conference, a pretrial order may be entered as directed by the Court, and the case certified as ready for trial. (f) Attorneys’ Binding Authority. Each party represented by an attorney shall be represented at each Court conference by an attorney who has the authority to bind that party regarding all matters previously identified by the Court for discussion at the conference and all reasonably related matters.
Source of truth
(a) Alternative Dispute Resolution. This Court has adopted an Alternative Dispute Resolution Plan (“ADR”), as implemented by Standing Order, under which certain civil cases are referred automatically to ADR upon filing. A copy of the Plan is available on the Court’s website, ht
- Official source
- W.D.N.Y. — Rules: Individual, Local & Federal (U.S. District Court, Western District of New York)
- Source health
- Healthy · checked November 14, 2026
- Effective date
- January 15, 2026
- Last verified
- November 3, 2026benchpath-nyfed-rules-2026-11-03
Related rules
2d Cir. Local Rule 25.2 — Submission of PDF Documents
2d Cir. Local Rule 25.2 — Submission of PDF Documents: the court's own rule, verbatim from the rule's own page on the court's site (read 2026-11-03; the page sha-custodied). Court-level requirement: applies in every appeal and proceeding before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, alongside the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Duval County Local Rules Implementing S.B. 7 (Texas Fair Defense Act) — Order Amending Local Rules of the District/County Court of Duval County, amended July 11, 2022
Duval County's indigent-defense and magistration rules under the Texas Fair Defense Act (S.B. 7): who may be booked into the county jail and on what paper; arrest-case numbering; presentment to a magistrate within 48 hours (art. 15.16); the magistrate's warnings, counsel inquiry, interpreter duty, indigence determination and appointment of counsel within 24 hours of a request; the alternative appointment plan under art. 26.04(g)-(h) with annual applications, seven attorney categories (capital, first and second degree, third degree/state jail/misdemeanor, competency, appeals, post-conviction, extradition), CLE and experience standards, random rotation within each category, written acceptance within 48 hours, first contact by the end of the next working day, replacement and suspension of counsel, fee applications within five days of completing services and the compensation attachment ($500 pleas; $175/$150 hourly; $1,400 per jury-trial day; appellate caps); bail schedules by offense class with a personal bond office (fee $20 or 3%), pre-trial supervision and revocation hearings within two working days; arraignment settings and notice; repeal of conflicting rules.
Starr County Local Rules for the Judicial District Courts (229th and 381st District Courts, applying in part to the County Court at Law; approved May 31, 2018; approved and recommended to the Supreme Court by the Fifth Region's Presiding Judge August 9, 2018)
The 23 local rules of the Starr County district courts: definitions and the election of the Local Administrative District Judge (last Friday in January of odd years; two-year term from February 1); random, equal assignment of district cases and the County Court at Law's share (family cases, civil cases pleading $100,000 or less, misdemeanors); the case-numbering format effective January 1, 2019 (year, CV/CR/CRS/FM/TAX, five digits; CRS for the 229th, CR for the 381st); notice of visiting-judge assignments; electronically transmitted pleadings (cover sheet, seven-day fee window, returns of service and bonds on paper, one-hour clerk handling of child-protection filings); transfer of related civil cases to the earlier court and SAPCR transfer to the divorce court; pre-trial settings through the Court Coordinator; District Clerk duties and I-Docket access; severance; temporary, emergency and ex parte orders; uncontested matters first; assignment of related prosecutions and superseding-indictment numbering (S1, S2); the protocol for trial priority (jury over non-jury, criminal over civil, jailed defendants first, oldest case first, special settings by written reasons, duties of counsel with conflicting settings); court staff; jury impaneling; the ad litem/guardian ad litem/amicus appointment rotation, duties, vouchers within thirty days and objections within thirty days; and courtroom decorum and attire.
Local Rules for the Jim Wells County Court at Law — effective January 1, 2023
The Jim Wells County Court at Law's rules: ad litem, guardian ad litem and amicus appointment lists, qualifications, duties, flat-fee ($275) and hourly ($75–$125) compensation, voucher deadlines and fee objections; rules of administration with the 79th District Court (family-code cases and civil cases between $500 and $250,000 assigned to the County Court at Law); remote non-jury proceedings by Zoom with e-mailed setting requests, Dropbox exhibits and YouTube broadcast; settings, proposed orders, exhibits and courtroom decorum.