Loc. R. Civ. P. 83.8 — Pro Bono Service
A published court requirement that applies in New York. Category: Local Rules. Effective January 15, 2026. Verified against the official source (W.D.N.Y. — Rules: Individual, Local & Federal (U.S. District Court, Western District of New York)) on November 3, 2026.
Summary
Loc. R. Civ. P. 83.8 — Pro Bono Service: the court's own rule, verbatim from the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, United States District Court for the Western District of New York, effective January 15, 2026 (official PDF, sha-custodied). Court-level requirement: applies in every civil case before the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, alongside the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the rules are numbered to conform to them) and any judge-specific procedures.
Requirement
The interests of justice and judicial economy are facilitated when counsel can be appointed to represent indigent pro se litigants. Participation in the Court’s Pro Bono Program not only bestows a service to the community by ensuring equal access to the courts through the provision of legal counsel to indigent litigants, but also greatly assists the Court in the adjudication of pro se cases. The New York Rules of Professional Conduct, which apply to all attorneys admitted to this Court, state that attorneys are “strongly encouraged” to provide pro bono legal services. While the Court recognizes that there are many pro bono services provided by volunteer attorneys throughout the community, the Court relies upon the generous cooperation and service from the attorneys admitted to practice before it to further these interests. (a) Formation of the Volunteer Panel, Assignment Wheel, and Senior Pro Bono Panel. The Clerk of Court will establish a “Volunteer Panel” and an “Assignment Wheel” which shall be used to assign Members of the bar of this Court to provide pro bono representation to indigent litigants in civil cases according to the criteria and procedures set forth in this Rule. The Court will also select attorneys to serve on a “Senior Pro Bono Panel” to assist attorneys appointed from the Volunteer Panel and Assignment Wheel. The Senior Pro Bono Panel will be selected from attorneys who, upon request of the Court, or otherwise, have volunteered to serve. A list of Senior Pro Bono Panel attorneys shall be maintained by the Clerk of Court. (1) Volunteer Panel. The Clerk of Court will establish a panel of pro bono volunteer attorneys, which shall be comprised of attorneys who are Members of the bar of this Court and who contact the Clerk’s Office in writing to request to be included on the Volunteer Panel. An attorney who volunteers to be placed on the Volunteer Panel may elect to volunteer for either full-scope or limited-scope appointments, or both. In a full-scope appointment, the attorney will represent the litigant in all aspects of the case before the Court (excluding any appellate practice unless the attorney agrees to provide appellate representation). In a limited-scope appointment, the attorney will represent the litigant only for the purpose or purposes identified by the Court in the Order of Appointment (unless the attorney reaches an agreement with the litigant to provide additional representation beyond that set forth in the Order of Appointment). Any attorney who has been placed on the Volunteer Panel may request in writing to be removed from that panel at any time, in which case the attorney shall be removed from that panel, but shall be placed on the Assignment Wheel and any pending appointments will remain in effect. The Court may remove an attorney from the Volunteer Panel for good cause. (2) Assignment Wheel. Any Member of the bar of this Court who has appeared as counsel of record in at least one civil or criminal action in the District within the last two (2) calendar years of the appointment, shall be included in the Assignment Wheel except for (a) an attorney whose office address is outside the District; (b) an attorney who is employed full-time as an attorney for an agency or branch of the United States, a State, or a municipality; (c) an attorney who is employed full-time as an attorney by a not-for-profit legal aid organization; (d) an attorney who has notified the Clerk of Court in writing that he or she has retired from the practice of law; (e) an attorney who has notified the Clerk of Court in writing that he or she has been suspended or resigned from the bar of this Court; or (f) an attorney who is on the Volunteer Panel or Senior Pro Bono Panel. Assignments made to attorneys from the Assignment Wheel may be either full-scope or limited-scope appointments. (3) Senior Pro Bono Panel. The Court recognizes that attorneys with limited experience can still provide valuable assistance to indigent litigants. To assist such attorneys, the Court has established a Senior Pro Bono Panel of experienced federal court practitioners to provide guidance and assistance in appropriate cases. In instances where an appointed attorney desires the assistance of an attorney with greater experience, the attorney is encouraged first to seek out assistance from an appropriate attorney within his or her firm, where applicable, who may enter an appearance as co- counsel. An attorney entering an appearance as co-counsel under these circumstances will receive the same benefits under the Rule as the initially appointed attorney. In the event that an appointed attorney is unable to enlist the assistance of co- counsel from within his or her firm, he or she may request the appointing Judge to (or the appointing Judge may sua sponte) appoint a member of the Senior Pro Bono Panel as co-counsel to that attorney. When a Senior Pro Bono Panel attorney is appointed, this attorney will act in a mentoring role to the initially appointed attorney, but will also be listed as counsel of record. Attorneys selected by the Court to be members of the Senior Pro Bono Panel, and who agree to serve, will not be included on the Volunteer Panel or Assignment Wheel unless otherwise requested. (b) Appointment of Counsel. (1) Pro bono counsel may be appointed by either the District Judge or the Magistrate Judge (“presiding Judge”) upon motion or sua sponte when the presiding Judge determines that appointment of counsel for an indigent litigant will serve the interests of justice. Newly filed cases in which any party is unrepresented may be evaluated by the presiding Judge for appointment of pro bono counsel under this Rule at an early stage. (2) The presiding Judge may appoint counsel for a specific limited purpose, such as for participating in mediation pursuant to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Plan, amending pleadings, conducting discovery, drafting or responding to motions, or for any other purpose the presiding Judge determines will serve the interests of justice. (3) Because of their common goal of providing access to justice, the Erie County Bar Association Volunteer Lawyers Project and JustCause, formerly the Volunteer Legal Services Project of Monroe County, Inc., have agreed that, when possible, attorneys appointed under this Rule shall be considered volunteers to those organizations and afforded all accompanying benefits. The parameters of involvement for those organizations will be detailed in the Order of Appointment. (c) Appointment Procedure. (1) Upon determining that pro bono counsel should be appointed, the presiding Judge may appoint an attorney from the Volunteer Panel or, if no attorney from the Volunteer Panel is available, may appoint an attorney selected from the Assignment Wheel. In either case, the Court will send a “Notice Letter” to the selected attorney advising of the impending appointment. (2) If the selected attorney does not seek relief from the appointment pursuant to subdivision (D) of this Rule, a “Notice of Appointment and Acknowledgment” will be mailed to the pro se litigant. If an executed Notice of Appointment and Acknowledgment is not received by the Court within twenty-one (21) business days of the date issued, no appointment will be made. Upon timely receipt of an executed Notice of Appointment and Acknowledgment, an Order of Appointment will be issued. (d) Relief from Appointments. (1) In the interests of justice and judicial economy to provide legal counsel to indigent litigants, and consistent with the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, attorneys are strongly encouraged to accept pro bono assignments under this program. If an attorney determines that it is necessary to seek relief from an impending appointment, such requests for relief shall be made by letter addressed to the presiding Judge within fourteen (14) business days of the date of the Notice Letter. Counsel will be deemed to have consented to the impending appointment unless relief from the impending appointment is requested within that time period. An Order of Appointment will be issued if no request for relief is made and an executed Notice of Appointment and Acknowledgment is timely returned by the pro se litigant. Any application to withdraw as counsel after an Order of Appointment is issued shall be made pursuant to the procedure set forth in Loc. R. Civ. P. 83.2(c). (2) Automatic relief from an appointment shall be granted, upon request, to any attorney who (a) has a conflict of interest as defined in the New York Rules of Professional Conduct (Rules 1.7-1.12); (b) is exempt from inclusion in the Assignment Wheel pursuant to subsections (A)(2)(a)-(f) of this Rule; (c) has appeared in a pro bono capacity in an assigned case currently pending before this Court; (d) has served in a pro bono capacity in any case in this district that has concluded within two years (for full-scope appointments) or one year (for limited- scope appointments); or (e) is an active member of the Criminal Justice Act Panel. Applications for automatic relief from an impending appointment should be made as soon as practicable, but no later than fourteen (14) business days of the date of the Notice Letter. (e) Scope and Duration of the Appointment. (1) Unless the Court grants a motion to withdraw pursuant to Loc. R. Civ. P. 83.2(c), any appointment under this Rule shall be limited to only those matters set forth in the Appointment Order and the appointed attorney shall represent the party in the action until a final judgment is entered (or some other order is entered terminating the action), or the issue(s) designated by the Court have been resolved. (2) Only in the case of a limited scope appointment, counsel shall file a notice of termination of limited representation, upon fulfillment of the appointment. Upon receipt of such notice, the Clerk of Court shall automatically terminate pro bono counsel from the case and terminate pro bono counsel’s receipt of ECF notifications related to the case. Any attorney appointed for a limited purpose may, with the concurrence of the litigant, apply at any time for an order expanding the appointment. (f) Expenses. (1) An attorney appointed pursuant to this Rule, who, for any reason is unsuccessful in recovering costs, may apply to the Court for reimbursement of expenses incident to the representation. Reimbursement will be permitted to the extent possible in light of available resources and pursuant to the Guidelines Governing Reimbursement from the District Court Fund of Expenses Incurred by Court Appointed Counsel (“Guidelines”) available on the Court’s website, http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov. Certain expenses require pre-approval as set forth in the Guidelines. (2) The Court considers any attorney appointed under this Rule to be a volunteer on behalf of a governmental entity for purposes of the Volunteer Protection Act of 1997, 42 U.S.C. §§ 14501-05, as long as such attorney does not receive an award of compensation for services in excess of $500 per year (other than reasonable reimbursement or allowance, approved by the Court under this Rule, for expenses actually incurred).
Source of truth
The interests of justice and judicial economy are facilitated when counsel can be appointed to represent indigent pro se litigants. Participation in the Court’s Pro Bono Program not only bestows a service to the community by ensuring equal access to the courts through the provis
- Official source
- W.D.N.Y. — Rules: Individual, Local & Federal (U.S. District Court, Western District of New York)
- Source health
- Healthy · checked November 14, 2026
- Effective date
- January 15, 2026
- Last verified
- November 3, 2026benchpath-nyfed-rules-2026-11-03
Related rules
2d Cir. Local Rule 25.2 — Submission of PDF Documents
2d Cir. Local Rule 25.2 — Submission of PDF Documents: the court's own rule, verbatim from the rule's own page on the court's site (read 2026-11-03; the page sha-custodied). Court-level requirement: applies in every appeal and proceeding before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, alongside the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Duval County Local Rules Implementing S.B. 7 (Texas Fair Defense Act) — Order Amending Local Rules of the District/County Court of Duval County, amended July 11, 2022
Duval County's indigent-defense and magistration rules under the Texas Fair Defense Act (S.B. 7): who may be booked into the county jail and on what paper; arrest-case numbering; presentment to a magistrate within 48 hours (art. 15.16); the magistrate's warnings, counsel inquiry, interpreter duty, indigence determination and appointment of counsel within 24 hours of a request; the alternative appointment plan under art. 26.04(g)-(h) with annual applications, seven attorney categories (capital, first and second degree, third degree/state jail/misdemeanor, competency, appeals, post-conviction, extradition), CLE and experience standards, random rotation within each category, written acceptance within 48 hours, first contact by the end of the next working day, replacement and suspension of counsel, fee applications within five days of completing services and the compensation attachment ($500 pleas; $175/$150 hourly; $1,400 per jury-trial day; appellate caps); bail schedules by offense class with a personal bond office (fee $20 or 3%), pre-trial supervision and revocation hearings within two working days; arraignment settings and notice; repeal of conflicting rules.
Starr County Local Rules for the Judicial District Courts (229th and 381st District Courts, applying in part to the County Court at Law; approved May 31, 2018; approved and recommended to the Supreme Court by the Fifth Region's Presiding Judge August 9, 2018)
The 23 local rules of the Starr County district courts: definitions and the election of the Local Administrative District Judge (last Friday in January of odd years; two-year term from February 1); random, equal assignment of district cases and the County Court at Law's share (family cases, civil cases pleading $100,000 or less, misdemeanors); the case-numbering format effective January 1, 2019 (year, CV/CR/CRS/FM/TAX, five digits; CRS for the 229th, CR for the 381st); notice of visiting-judge assignments; electronically transmitted pleadings (cover sheet, seven-day fee window, returns of service and bonds on paper, one-hour clerk handling of child-protection filings); transfer of related civil cases to the earlier court and SAPCR transfer to the divorce court; pre-trial settings through the Court Coordinator; District Clerk duties and I-Docket access; severance; temporary, emergency and ex parte orders; uncontested matters first; assignment of related prosecutions and superseding-indictment numbering (S1, S2); the protocol for trial priority (jury over non-jury, criminal over civil, jailed defendants first, oldest case first, special settings by written reasons, duties of counsel with conflicting settings); court staff; jury impaneling; the ad litem/guardian ad litem/amicus appointment rotation, duties, vouchers within thirty days and objections within thirty days; and courtroom decorum and attire.
Local Rules for the Jim Wells County Court at Law — effective January 1, 2023
The Jim Wells County Court at Law's rules: ad litem, guardian ad litem and amicus appointment lists, qualifications, duties, flat-fee ($275) and hourly ($75–$125) compensation, voucher deadlines and fee objections; rules of administration with the 79th District Court (family-code cases and civil cases between $500 and $250,000 assigned to the County Court at Law); remote non-jury proceedings by Zoom with e-mailed setting requests, Dropbox exhibits and YouTube broadcast; settings, proposed orders, exhibits and courtroom decorum.