Loading…
Jail-time credit is considered only on a written Motion for Time Served from the defendant or counsel with proof of incarceration attached, and is granted only for custody under a valid warrant or capias issued by the Precinct 1 justice court before the incarceration; every time-served motion and order a judge considers or signs is retained and transmitted to the justice of the peace for the case file.
Applies to requests for jail-time credit in cases before the Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1, Aransas County (Judge Vada "Diane" Dupnik). A second registration of the same order (doc 985, order number left blank, referring to the Aransas County Sheriff) is recorded, not published twice. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Justice of the Peace, Pct. 1, Aransas County, TX — Judicial Standing Order No. 25 – Time-served Orders (Revised January 05, 2023). Issuance Of "Time Served" Orders. IT IS ORDERED that a Justice of the Peace may consider a request for jail-time credit from a defendant, whether or not currently in the custody of the Aransas County Detention Center, only after the receipt of a written Motion for Time
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-07 from the TOPICs custody file (one text-layer page read in full). Single current signer (Justice of the Peace Vada Dupnik, signing as Diane Dupnik) — judge-joined. Aransas registered a second copy of this order as doc 985 ("Judicial Standing Order No. __", Sheriff wording); adjudicated as a duplicate record.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
1 verified requirement in this section
Verified requirements for Judge Vada (Diane) Dupnik unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →0 checklist steps in this section
Verified the action checklist unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →