Loading…
A defendant with an outstanding warrant who appears voluntarily is arrested unless they make a good-faith effort to resolve it under Standing Order No. 31; cash bonds may be posted by cash, cashier's check, money order or card (no personal checks), a personal bond is accepted after a financial questionnaire, warrants are recalled on bond or payment, appearance bonds must be signed by the principal (attorney bonds with bar number after a notice of appearance), no bond is required before the court signs a warrant, and a cash bond is required after a judgment nisi. A defendant with a capias pro fine is arrested unless they resolve the amount under Standing Order No. 32; after a verified questionnaire the capias is recalled and a show-cause hearing set, and refusal to complete it means the capias is executed.
Applies to warrants, bonds and capias pro fine matters before the Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1, Aransas County (Judge Vada "Diane" Dupnik); read with Standing Orders No. 31 (failure to appear) and No. 32 (capias pro fine procedures). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Justice of the Peace, Aransas County, TX — Judicial Standing Order No. 8 – Warrants and Capias Pro Fines (Revised January 05, 2023). Warrants. IT IS ORDERED that a defendant who voluntarily appears in Court or at the Court Clerk's Window for whom a warrant of arrest has been issued shall be arrested unless they make a good faith effort to resolve the arrest warrant in accordance with Judicial Stan
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-07 from the TOPICs custody file (two text-layer pages read in full). Single current signer (Justice of the Peace Vada Dupnik, signing as Diane Dupnik) — judge-joined. The warrant-recall sentence names the "Lewisville Police Department" — a template artifact of the instrument (adapted from a Lewisville municipal-court model); transcribed as registered.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
1 verified requirement in this section
Verified requirements for Judge Vada (Diane) Dupnik unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →0 checklist steps in this section
Verified the action checklist unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →