Loading…
Before a failure-to-appear warrant issues, the clerk mails the defendant, the day after the missed initial setting, a notice of a new date within 30 days with the court's name and location and the required paragraphs on payment options and on the consequences of a further non-appearance (warrant, DPS notice affecting license and registration renewal, added costs). A defendant who then appears to resolve the warrant is set on the FTA docket, a written request earns an alternative date within 21 days, and a voluntary appearance with a good-faith effort (a plea with a bond, a financial questionnaire, a payment date or plan, or a promise to appear) recalls the warrant.
Applies to defendants who miss the initial court setting before the Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1, Aransas County (Judge Vada "Diane" Dupnik); read with Standing Order No. 8 (warrants). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Aransas County JP1 Court — Judicial Standing Order No. 31 - Failure to Appear at Initial Court Setting (Revised January 5, 2023). Before a warrant of arrest can be issued for failure to appear at a court setting, the following procedures, consistent with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, shall be observed. Definitions: "Initial Court Setting" shall mean the date on the written promise to appear no
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-07 from the TOPICs custody file (two text-layer pages read in full). Single current signer (Justice of the Peace Vada Dupnik, signing as Diane Dupnik) — judge-joined.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
1 verified requirement in this section
Verified requirements for Judge Vada (Diane) Dupnik unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →0 checklist steps in this section
Verified the action checklist unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →