Loading…
Before a capias pro fine issues for an unsatisfied judgment, the clerk mails a notice of a date within 21 days with the court's name and location and the required paragraphs on payment options and on the consequences of non-appearance; a defendant who appears before execution and resolves the amount (payment in full now or by a date, an installment plan under Standing Order No. 20, a long-form financial questionnaire with a promise to appear at the indigency hearing docket) completes the questionnaire, and once the contact information is verified the capias is recalled; refusal to complete it means the capias is executed.
Applies to unsatisfied judgments before the Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1, Aransas County (Judge Vada "Diane" Dupnik); read with Standing Order No. 8 (capias pro fines). The installment-plan Standing Order No. 20 it cites was not among Aransas County's TOPICs registrations. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Justice of the Peace, Pct.1 Aransas County, TX — Judicial Standing Order No. 32 – Capias Pro Fine Procedures (January 05, 2023). IT IS ORDERED that before a Capias Pro Fine can be issued for failure to satisfy the judgment in a particular case, the following procedures, consistent with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, shall be observed. Definitions: Appears "to resolve the amount owed" shall mean
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-07 from the TOPICs custody file (two text-layer pages read in full). Single current signer (Justice of the Peace Vada Dupnik, signing as Diane Dupnik) — judge-joined. Standing Order No. 20 (installment plans), cross-referenced here, is not registered on TOPICs for Aransas County — noted, not invented.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
1 verified requirement in this section
Verified requirements for Judge Vada (Diane) Dupnik unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →0 checklist steps in this section
Verified the action checklist unlocks with a Single Report ($29) or Professional ($99/month) — create a free account to preview the dossier first.
Unlock free →