Loading…
The thirteen county court at law judges hearing criminal matters adopt the standard breath-test discovery order (Intoxilyzer 9000) and the amended standing blood-test discovery order for use in their courts.
Applies to DWI discovery in County Courts at Law Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 of Bexar County; the adopted orders' texts are published from TOPICs docs 465 (breath) and 467 (blood). Thirteen signers; no judge join. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
2023 SO 09 — SPECIAL ORDER. STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF BEXAR — IN THE COUNTY COURTS GIVING PREFERENCE TO CRIMINAL MATTERS 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, AND 15. ADOPTION OF STANDARD ORDER FOR DISCOVERY OF BREATH TESTING RECORDS FOR INTOXILYZER 9000 AND AMENDED STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER ON COPYING AND PRODUCTION OF BLOOD TESTING RECORDS The County Court at Law Judges hearing criminal matters hereby adopt the above-referenced Orders. It is ORDERED that this Special Order be filed for record with the County Clerk of Bexar County. SIGNED, ORDERED, AND ENTERED ON THIS ____ day of 08/29/2023, 2023, by: Judge Melissa Vara, Administrative Judge, County Court at Law No. 15; Judge Helen Petry Stowe, County Court at Law No. 1; Judge Melissa Saenz, County Court at Law No. 2; Judge Alfredo M. Ximenez, County Court at Law No. 4; Judge Andrea Arevalos, County Court at Law No. 5; Judge Erica Dominguez, County Court at Law No. 6; Judge Melanie M. Lira, County Court at Law No. 7; Judge Mary Román, County Court at Law No. 8; Judge Gloria Saldaña, County Court at Law No. 9; Judge Erica Peña, County Court at Law No. 11; Judge Yolanda T. Huff, County Court at Law No. 12; Judge Rosie Speedlin González, County Court at Law No. 13; Judge Carlo Rodriguez Key, County Court at Law No. 14. [Electronic signatures dated August 28–30, 2023; filed with the County Clerk August 31, 2023.]
2023 SO 09 — SPECIAL ORDER. STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF BEXAR — IN THE COUNTY COURTS GIVING PREFERENCE TO CRIMINAL MATTERS 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, AND 15. ADOPTION OF STANDARD ORDER FOR DISCOVERY OF BREATH TESTING RECORDS FOR INTOXILYZER 9000 AND AMENDED STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER ON COPYING AND PRODUCTION OF BLOOD TESTING RECORDS The County Court at Law Judges hearing criminal matters
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-08 from the TOPICs custody file (two image-only pages read through the vision lane). The re-adoption carries no attachments; the adopted texts are those registered as docs 465 and 467.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.