Loading…
Pre-Trial Supervision officers must permit persons under pre-trial supervision, including GPS monitoring, to attend four verified events without further permission or court order, provided no no-contact order is violated: the funeral of an immediate family member (absent other condition conflicts), a physician appointment, a meeting with the attorney of record at the attorney's office, and a hospital or emergency clinic visit for a verified medical emergency.
Applies to all conditions of bond supervised by Bexar County Pre-Trial Supervision in cases of the 144th, 175th, 186th, 187th, 226th, 227th, 290th, 379th, 399th and 437th District Courts. Ten judges signed; no judge join. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
SPECIAL ORDER NO. 73334. STATE OF TEXAS AND COUNTY OF BEXAR — IN THE DISTRICT COURTS GIVING PREFERENCE TO CRIMINAL MATTERS, 144TH, 175TH, 186TH, 187TH, 226TH, 227TH, 290TH, 379TH, 399TH, AND 437TH, OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. STANDING ORDER REGARDING PRE-TRIAL SUPERVISION The Criminal District Court Judges of Bexar County hereby issue the following Standing Order: For individuals under Pre-Trial Supervision, the Pre-Trial Supervision officer shall permit attendance at the following verified events without requiring further permission or order from the Court, provided that such attendance does not violate any no-contact orders: 1. Attendance at a verified funeral of an immediate family member, as long as there are no other conflicts with respect to any other condition. 2. Attendance at a verified physician appointment. 3. Meeting with the attorney of record at the attorney's office. 4. Attendance at a hospital or emergency clinic for a verified medical emergency. This order applies to all conditions of bond supervised by Pre-Trial Supervision, including GPS monitoring. SIGNED, ORDERED AND ENTERED THE 12th day of August, 2024. Michael Mery, Judge, 144th Judicial District Court; Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge, 175th Judicial District Court; Kristina Escalona, Judge, 186th Judicial District Court; Stephanie Boyd, Judge, 187th Judicial District Court; Velia Meza, Judge, 226th Judicial District Court; Christine Del Prado, Judge, 227th Judicial District Court; Jennifer Peña, Judge, 290th Judicial District Court; Ron Rangel, Judge, 379th Judicial District Court; Frank Castro, Judge, 399th Judicial District Court; Joel Perez, Judge, 437th Judicial District Court. [Electronic signatures dated August 12–13, 2024; certified copy of the District Clerk August 15, 2024; case number 73334.]
SPECIAL ORDER NO. 73334. STATE OF TEXAS AND COUNTY OF BEXAR — IN THE DISTRICT COURTS GIVING PREFERENCE TO CRIMINAL MATTERS, 144TH, 175TH, 186TH, 187TH, 226TH, 227TH, 290TH, 379TH, 399TH, AND 437TH, OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. STANDING ORDER REGARDING PRE-TRIAL SUPERVISION The Criminal District Court Judges of Bexar County hereby issue the following Standing Order: For individuals under Pre-Trial Super
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-08 from the TOPICs custody file (three image-only pages read through the vision lane; page 3 is the clerk's certificate). Electronic signature stamps August 12–13, 2024.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.