Loading…
Directs the County Auditor, CSCD and Court Collections to apply misdemeanor payments in a fixed order: for County Courts at Law 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 — family violence fee, then individual restitution, then monthly supervisory fees until current, then fines and court costs 50/50, then miscellaneous fees; for County Court at Law No. 6 — family violence fee, restitution, fines and court costs 50/50, then supervisory fees, then miscellaneous fees.
Applies to collection of fines, fees, costs and restitution in criminal cases of County Courts at Law Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 of Bexar County. Thirteen signers (several since departed); no judge join. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
SPECIAL ORDER. STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF BEXAR — IN THE COUNTY COURTS GIVING PREFERENCE TO CRIMINAL MATTERS 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, AND 15. JOINT RESOLUTION REGARDING PRIORITIZATION OF COURT COLLECTIONS This Order of the Criminal County Court at Law Judges is intended to direct the Bexar County Auditor's Office, CSCD, and Bexar County Court Collections to adjust the Court Collection priorities as follows: County Courts at Law numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15: 1st priority – 100% Family Violence fee until paid in full; 2nd priority – 100% Restitution (individual) until paid in full; 3rd priority – 100% Monthly supervisory fees until current for the month; 4th priority – Fines (50%) and Court Costs (50%) until paid in full; Remainder to miscellaneous fees, including Crime Stoppers Fee, Lab Fees, and Court Appointed Fees, if applicable. County Courts at Law numbers 6: 1st priority – 100% Family Violence fee until paid in full; 2nd priority – 100% Restitution (individual) until paid in full; 3rd priority – Fines (50%) and Court Costs (50%) until paid in full; 4th priority – 100% Monthly supervisory fees until current for the month; Remainder to miscellaneous fees, including Crime Stoppers Fee, Lab Fees, and Court Appointed Fees, if applicable. It is ORDERED that this Joint Order be filed for record with the County Clerk of Bexar County. SIGNED, ORDERED, AND ENTERED ON THIS ____ day of ____ 2022 [electronic signatures July 18–19, 2022], by: Judge John A. Longoria, Administrative Judge, County Court at Law No. 5; Judge Helen Petry Stowe, County Court at Law No. 1; Judge Grace M. Uzomba, County Court at Law No. 2; Judge Alfredo M. Ximenez, County Court at Law No. 4; Judge Wayne A. Christian, County Court at Law No. 6; Judge Michael De Leon, County Court at Law No. 7; Judge Mary Román, County Court at Law No. 8; Judge Gloria Saldaña, County Court at Law No. 9; Judge Tommy Stolhandske, County Court at Law No. 11; Judge Yolanda T. Huff, County Court at Law No. 12; Judge Rosie Speedlin González, County Court at Law No. 13; Judge Carlo Key, County Court at Law No. 14; Judge Melissa Vara, County Court at Law No. 15.
SPECIAL ORDER. STATE OF TEXAS, COUNTY OF BEXAR — IN THE COUNTY COURTS GIVING PREFERENCE TO CRIMINAL MATTERS 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, AND 15. JOINT RESOLUTION REGARDING PRIORITIZATION OF COURT COLLECTIONS This Order of the Criminal County Court at Law Judges is intended to direct the Bexar County Auditor's Office, CSCD, and Bexar County Court Collections to adjust the Court Collectio
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-08 from the TOPICs custody file (two pages; native text layer with electronic-signature stamps, read in full). The day and month are blank in the order line; the last electronic signature (July 19, 2022) is carried as the effective date.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.