Loading…
A standing order of the Clay County Justice Court requiring every civil continuance motion to carry a certificate of conference stating whether it is opposed and a proposed order.
Applies to civil cases before the Clay County Justice Court. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Justice Court of Clay County 214 N. Main Street Phone: 940.538.6531 P.O. Box 71 FAX: 940.264.4161 Henrietta, Texas 76365 STANDING ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CIVIL CASE 1. All motions for a continuance in a civil case shall contain a CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE which states whether the motion is opposed or unopposed and a proposed order. 2. If the motion is unopposed, the proposed order shall be provided upon the Court’s NOTICE OF AGREED SETTING form, which shall be signed by the Plaintiff (or their attorney if represented) and the defendant (of their attorney if represented). The Court shall be consulted prior to entering a date and time for the reset. 3. No motion for continuance will be considered which does not comply with this Order. 4. Except in the case of emergency, a motion for continuance in a civil case shall be in writing, state why the postponement is necessary, and shall be filed with the Court at least three (3) business days preceding the date of the current setting, exclusive of the current setting day. 5. This Order shall not be interpreted to restrict the discretion of the Court in any respect regarding whether to require a hearing or trial on any uncontested or agreed matter presented to the Court for approval. Signed this the 10th day of February 2023. [signature] Judge, Justice Court of Clay County [seal: Justice Court, Precinct 1, Clay County, Texas]
Justice Court of Clay County Standing Order Regarding Request for Continuance of a Civil Case. All motions for a continuance in a civil case shall contain a Certificate of Conference stating whether the motion is opposed or unopposed and a proposed order; if the motion is unopposed, the proposed order shall be provided upon the Court's notice of an agreed setting, and the order governs how opposed
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-06 from the TOPICs custody scan (text layer read). Clay countywide Justice Court order. [RECOMPOSED 2026-09-21 (corpus-0920 P7, digital-layer lane): the full text of the registered file (sha256 24b7c6e215bd..., 1 pages) replaces the earlier 433-character abstract. Method: pypdfium2 text layer reflowed page-aware, cross-checked word-by-word against PyMuPDF (0 substantive difference(s), 0 page-furniture), owner-corpus candidate sentences 100% (5/5) matched, 0 running header/footer line(s) removed, no U+FFFD/U+FFFE/form-feed debris. NOT yet checked page by page against the render, so confidence is medium with an open re-verification task; flip to high when a reviewer has read every page against the PDF. benchpath-tx-corpus0920-p7-2026-09-21] [BY-EYE CHECK 2026-09-21 (corpus-0920 P11): every page of the registered file (sha256 24b7c6e215bd..., 1 page(s)) read against the rendered PDF; file-stamp, caption and signature-block defects of the text layer corrected from the render; confidence lifted to high. benchpath-tx-corpus0920-p11-2026-09-21]
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.
Standing order of the 109th Judicial District Court for every pending or later-filed case in Andrews, Winkler and Crane Counties: any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any form of artificial intelligence for legal research or drafting in a case must, before using AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, sign and submit the court's certification form stating that all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were verified as accurate by a human through traditional (non-AI) legal sources, and acknowledging responsibility and potential sanctions for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. Effective immediately; in effect until rescinded or replaced.